Wikipedia:Editor review/Matt91486

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

[edit] Matt91486

Matt91486 (talk · contribs) I've been editing on Wikipedia for a while now, and I've got some free time this summer, so I will probably continue to be working at a relatively brisk pace. I'm just looking to see where I can improve as an editor matt91486 04:11, 1 June 2007 (UTC)

Reviews

Ok here we go, 12 days after the reqest you will finaly get your first review. Overall you are a very good editor. Your have a high edit summary rate, you are involved in building coperation (starting a wikiproject mainly) without any real conflicts (or at least any I saw), and all your many mainspace edits were of high quality. I only saw a few things you could improve on;

  1. Use redirects spareingly, you have a tendency to use redirects when they are not needed. Generaly redirects are only suposed to be used when an article has two durasticly different titles and would not show up as a result in a WikiSearch, redirecting "List of Chef! Characters" to "List of Chef! characters" is unesassary.
  2. Mark minor edits, I noticed that you mark some of your minor edits but not all, things like a link being added or fixed ([1][2][3][4])should definitly be marked as minor. -Ĭ₠ŴΣĐĝё 07:31, 12 June 2007 (UTC)
  3. Vandalize more Help revert I mean, not nesasary but its always nice to help out and stop them vandals.

OK there is your long overdue review. Please frogive my afful speling seing as I am in lack of my trusty firefox spell checker. Cheers :) -Ĭ₠ŴΣĐĝё 07:31, 12 June 2007 (UTC)

Comments

Questions

  1. Of your contributions to Wikipedia, are there any about which you are particularly pleased, and why?
    Well, I think I'm most pleased with the work I've done with college basketball topics as a whole. I think I've done the best job working on making sub-articles and removing red-links in the other articles I've created in that area. I also am fairly pleased with my work towards DYK articles. I certainly understand that Wikipedia is not a competition, but I do enjoy starting articles from scratch and turning them into something relatively substantial.
  2. Have you been in any conflicts over editing in the past or do you feel other users have caused you stress? How have you dealt with it and how will you deal with it in the future?
    My only real conflict with editing was over a statement in the Minnesota State Knowledge Bowl article. The issue turned out to be a misunderstanding more than anything. Thankfully both parties discussed it, we didn't get into an edit war, and it ended up turning into just a discussion. Substantial conflict was averted, as is always the best scenario.

Additional Questions from Dfrg.msc:

Borrowed from Glen (talk · contribs), I'm sure he wont mind. These should test you editing skills, and show if you have any weaknesses which you can work on. So, just write your answer next to the Question. Good luck.

Speedy Delete or not:

  1. CSD1
  2. CSD2
  3. CSD3
  4. CSD4
  5. CSD5

Vandalism or or not:

  1. [5]
  2. [6]
  3. [7]
  4. [8]
  5. [9]
  6. [10]

Have fun! Dfrg.msc 07:40, 5 July 2007 (UTC)