Wikipedia:Editor review/Kyriakos 2

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

[edit] Kyriakos

Kyriakos (talk ยท contribs) I have been a Wikipedian for three years. In that time I have made around 5400 edits and am a cooridantor at WPMILHIST. I had a review in Janurary and since then I hae failed a RfA. Even though that didn't really matter I would like some outside opinions on how I should improve in Wikipedia. Any suggestions would be appreciated. Thanks. Kyriakos 22:27, 28 July 2007 (UTC)

Reviews

  1. You appear to be an excellent editor; focused and dedicated to your area of expertise. It would appear early on you did not leave many edit summaries - but in your more recent months you have. I can see you have been active not only in Wikipedia space, but Portal space too, which was a comment brought up in your previous editor review. The only suggestion I can make is perhaps to get involved with the AFD process - keeping your eyes peeled on any subjects or topics that fall into your range of interest that you could provide a more informed opinion on. --Ozgod 22:37, 30 July 2007 (UTC)

Comments

Questions

  1. Of your contributions to Wikipedia, are there any about which you are particularly pleased, and why?
    I have quite a few articles I am pleased with. Firstly my two FA articles: War against Nabis and Cretan War. As well I am pleased with my GA articles: Battle of Gythium, Maniots and Egyptian Invasion of Mani. I'm also happy with my upcoming artilces: Galatian War and Siege of Eretria.
  2. Have you been in any conflicts over editing in the past or do you feel other users have caused you stress? How have you dealt with it and how will you deal with it in the future?
    I haven't been in many conflicts but I was semi involved in the dispute between Greek and Turkish editors on the Pontic Greek Genocide article.