Wikipedia:Editor review/Juliancolton

Juliancolton (talk · contribs) I need an overall check-up. Also, I would like to know how close I am to being ready for an RfA. Juliancolton ^{The storm still blows...} 19:10, 28 February 2008 (UTC)

Reviews

I had a look through your contribs and various diffs. I see that you pay attention to detail and take pride in correcting or updating articles in your areas of interest. You have a lot of automated edits but also a lot of manual, thoughtful edits to articles that really demonstrate a commitment to quality and thoroughness. It is also good to see that you are using edit summaries consistently now. In terms of RfA, I see fairly diverse contribs with a good balance. And from what I can see, you are polite and positive with fellow users. I think you'd have a successful at RfA and I'd support. κaτaʟaveno^T_C 02:36, 5 March 2008 (UTC)

Comments

Questions

Of your contributions to Wikipedia, are there any about which you are particularly pleased, and why?

Well, the way I usually find myself contributing is to WP:WPTC, which is where my biggest intrest and most number of edits are to. I also edit for the WP:USRD, and I often participate in WP:FPC. I also am actively reviewing GANs lately. It's hard to say what my favorite article is; from the WPTC, I expecially like Hurricane Hernan (2002), which I recently created, and from the USRD, my favorite article is Connecticut Route 190, which I created a month or so ago, and with the help from another user, is now a GA.
Have you been in any conflicts over editing in the past or do you feel other users have caused you stress? How have you dealt with it and how will you deal with it in the future?

When I find myself in a conflict, I usually try to back out, or discuss it with good faith. In the past, I have gotten into minor edit wars, although since then, I have greatly improved, and have not gotten into an edit war or a serious argument in months.