Wikipedia:Editor review/Ideogram
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
[edit] Ideogram*
Reviews
- Firstly, I would like to congratulate you on your hard work with WP:MEDCAB, I'm also impressed by your usage of the edit summary field, its currently at 98% which is near the top, it would be better if you could push it up that little further. Checking your edit count... I also see you have over 1000 edits — that is also a sign of dedication to this Project, overall I think you are doing really well and have plenty of experience and an excellent edit count (but edit count is not everything!). However, if I may; I would like to point out that you did not write an introductory statement at the top of the review. Kindest Regards --The Sunshine Man 11:08, 2 June 2007 (UTC)
Comments
- View this user's edit count using Interiot's 'Wannabe Kate' Tool.
- View this user's edit summary usage with mathbot's tool
Questions
- Of your contributions to Wikipedia, are there any about which you are particularly pleased, and why?
- I am most proud of my contributions to WP:MEDCAB.
- Have you been in any conflicts over editing in the past or do you feel other users have caused you stress? How have you dealt with it and how will you deal with it in the future?
- I have had a lot of conflict with many users. I have not dealt with it well at all (I have a short temper). I have recently been sanctioned by ArbCom, apparently because I have a "documented problem with revert-warring" with the other party to the case. Needless to say this is not my interpretation of events. This editor review request is an attempt to understand how this came to pass.
