Wikipedia:Editor Review/Eluchil404

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

[edit] User:Eluchil404

Eluchil404 (talk ยท contribs) I have been active in wikification of articles that I've found at WP:DEAD and in WP:AfD and am curious about what I could do to better serve the community. I am interested in an WP:RfA at the appropriate time since I would like to be able to close AfD's other than obvious Keeps and help with backlogs at WP:RM and other such housekeeping kind of chores. Eluchil404 20:15, 1 July 2006 (UTC)

Reviews

Comments

Username           Eluchil404
Total edits             1200
Distinct pages edited   806
Average edits/page      1.489
First edit              23:15, March 2, 2006
        
(main)          542
Talk            174
User            38
User talk       35
Image           6
Image talk      3
Wikipedia       389
Wikipedia talk  13

Questions

  1. Of your contributions to Wikipedia, are there any about which you are particularly pleased, and why?
    Nothing that exciting. My most substantial contributions have been to Vatta's War which I have taken from this to this. My best housekeeping edits were probably to Islamic Flags diff. There are some other articles listed on my userpage but they aren't too exciting.
  2. Have you been in any conflicts over editing in the past or do you feel other users have caused you stress? How have you dealt with it and how will you deal with it in the future?
    I have only ever really been in minor conflicts. Probably the most stressed I got was over the deltion of Walk To Emmaus which I felt was clearly notable per WP:ORG. I tried to appeal the case to WP:DRV but got smacked down pretty hard. I have a copy of the article in my userspace to rewrite when I get the chance using some of the reliable sources I have accumulated at User:Eluchil404/Emmaus Resources when I get the chance. The coping strategies I used in that instance would probably be the ones I would use again: try to use process to get the result I want, ask for clarification of policies or decisions I think are erroneous, if consensus is clearly against me withdraw and work on a suitable solution outide the article space that can hopefully achieve consensus support.