User talk:Eddos 1983

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Welcome!

Hello, Eddos 1983, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome!  Robdurbar 09:59, 26 March 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Martin Brundle

Hi. You added:

"Smart, witty and with an exceptionally good command of the English language, Martin has carried F1-ITV's race coverage commentary almost single-handedly since Murray Walker's retirement in 2001."

I agree with you, Brundle is brilliant and James Allen, eh.. isn't. Still, it's a Point of View and not really appropriate. I take it your a Brundle fan? You've got to love the grid-walks? If you haven't done so before search the web for Brundle quotes — they're hilarious. Mark83 21:05, 4 April 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Talk page edit

Thanks for your message. Go ahead, however just because a person has video footage doesn't mean they have no POV. I'll assume you're British and say suppose someone shows a random person footage of Gordon Brown. If that person voted Labour they will likely be sympathetic, if they voted Tory they will likely be hostile. Likewise in the U.S. The same footage of Bush could be used by a Democrat to show him as an idiot and by a Republican to show him as a great campaigner.

I've shown above that I'm a big fan of Brundle, that doesn't mean I'm willing to see POV attacks on Allen.

Please sign your talk page posts with ~~~~ Best regards, Mark83 23:59, 24 November 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Juliet Aubrey

The article Juliet Aubrey has been or soon will be deleted from Wikipedia. This happened because the article seems to be about a subject but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable. If you can indicate why the subject is really notable, you are free to re-create the article, making sure to cite any verifiable sources. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. You might also want to read our criteria for speedy deletion, particularly item 7 under Articles. -- Merope 15:11, 28 November 2006 (UTC)

Yeah, that all sounds good. The problem is that you can't just say "so-and-so is an actress" because that alone doesn't establish notability. Emma Thompson is an actress, but so is the seventeen year old who was almost an extra on The O.C.. You just need to give a little more information. Feel free to recreate the article. -- Merope 15:27, 28 November 2006 (UTC)