User:Ed!/Reviews
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
< User:Ed!
| Reviews | ||
|
I occasionally review GA nominees for promotion, to help clear the extensive backlog that the GA page always seems to have. This is a history of the articles I have given a GA review to, for records of anyone who wishes to look over them. I am not a picky reviewer, and I really don't mind reviewing anything, and thus do not have any partcular areas of focus when it comes to reviewing GAs. If you feel that I consistantly am judging nominees unfairly or incorrectly, please let me know. I don't pretend to be an expert on what makes an article "good". |
||
| Totals | |
|---|---|
| 19 | |
| 4 | |
| 12 | |
| Total Reviews | 35 |
[edit] GA Review
- It is reasonably well written:
- It is factually accurate and verifiable:
- It is broad in its coverage:
- It follows the neutral point of view policy:
- It is stable:
- It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate:
- Overall:

