Talk:ECW One Night Stand (2005)

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the ECW One Night Stand (2005) article.
Please sign and date your posts by typing four tildes (~~~~). Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic. New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Ask questions, get answers. This is not a forum for general discussion about the article's subject.	Be polite Assume good faith No personal attacks Be welcoming	Article policies No original research Neutral point of view Verifiability

	ECW One Night Stand (2005) has been listed as one of the Everyday life good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can delist it, or ask for a reassessment.
Article milestones Date Process Result September 30, 2007 Peer review Reviewed November 10, 2007 Good article nominee Listed Current Status: Good article

	Professional wrestling Portal ECW One Night Stand (2005) is within the scope of WikiProject Professional wrestling, an attempt to improve and standardize articles related to professional wrestling. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, visit the project to-do page, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and contribute to discussions.
GA	This article has been rated as GA-Class on the quality scale.
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the importance scale.

[edit] GA Review

I am glad to report that this article nomination for good article status has been promoted. This is how the article, as of November 10, 2007, compares against the six good article criteria:

GA review (see here for criteria)

1. Is it reasonably well written?

   A. Prose quality:

   B. MoS compliance:

2. Is it factually accurate and verifiable?

   A. References to sources:

   B. Citation of reliable sources where necessary:

   C. No original research:

3. Is it broad in its coverage?

   A. Major aspects:

   B. Focused:

4. Is it neutral?

   Fair representation without bias:

5. Is it stable?

   No edit wars, etc:

6. Does it contain images to illustrate the topic?

   A. Images are copyright tagged, and non-free images have fair use rationales:

   B. Images are provided where possible and appropriate, with suitable captions:

7. Overall:

   Pass or Fail:

If you feel that this review is in error, feel free to take it to Good article reassessment. Thank you to all of the editors who worked hard to bring it to this status, and congratulations. -- LAX 00:11, 11 November 2007 (UTC)