Ecotax

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Public finance
This article is part of the series:
Finance and Taxation
Taxation
Income tax  ·  Payroll tax
CGT ·  Stamp duty  ·  LVT
Sales tax  ·  VAT  ·  Flat tax
Tax, tariff and trade
Tax haven
Tax incidence
Tax rate  ·   Proportional tax
Progressive tax  ·   Regressive tax
Tax advantage
Taxation by country
Economic policy
Monetary policy
Central bank  ·   Money supply
Gold standard
Fiscal policy
Spending  ·   Deficit  ·   Debt
Policy-mix
Trade policy
Tariff  ·   Trade agreement
Finance
Financial market
Financial market participants
Corporate  ·   Personal
Public  ·   Regulation
Banking
Fractional-reserve
Full-reserve  ·   Free banking
Islamic
 view • talk • edit • project

Ecotax, short for Ecological taxation, can refer to:

  1. A fiscal policy that introduces taxes intended to promote ecologically sustainable activities via economic incentives. Such a policy can complement or avert the need for regulatory approaches. Often, such a policy intends to maintain overall tax revenue by proportionately reducing other taxes, e.g. on human labor and renewable resources, in which case it is known as the green tax shift towards ecological taxation.
  2. The Pigovian taxes that are introduced by such a policy - see below.

Contents

[edit] Taxes affected

Examples of taxes which could be lowered by a green tax shift:

Examples of ecotaxes which could be implemented or increased:

[edit] General remarks

The object of a green tax shift is often to implement a "full cost accounting", using fiscal policy to internalize market distorting externalities, which leads to sustainable wealth creation.

Tax shifting usually includes balancing taxation levels to be revenue-neutral for government and to maintain overall progressivity.

Basic economic theory recognizes the existence of externalities and their potential negative effects. To the extent that green taxes correct for externalities such as pollution, they correspond with mainstream economic theory. In practice, however, setting the correct taxation level or the tax collection system needed to do so is difficult, and may lead to further distortions or unintended consequences.

Taxes on consumption may take the feebate approach advocated by Amory Lovins in which additional fees on less sustainable products — such as sport utility vehicles — are pooled to fund subsidies on more sustainable alternatives — such as hybrid electric vehicles.

[edit] Progressive or Regressive?

Some green tax shift proposals have been criticized as being fiscally regressive (a tax with a marginal rate that decreases as the taxpayer's income increases). Taxing negative externalities usually entails exerting a burden on consumption, and since the poor consume more and save or invest less as a share of their income, any shift towards consumption taxes can be regressive. In 2004, research by the Policy Studies Institute and Joseph Rowntree Foundation seemed to confirm this view.[1]

However, conventional regulatory approaches can affect prices in much the same way, while lacking the revenue-recycling potential of ecotaxes. Moreover, correctly assessing distributive impact of any tax shift requires an analysis of the specific instrument design features. For example, an ecotax can have a "lifeline" design, in which modest consumption levels are priced relatively low (even zero, in the case of water), and higher consumption levels are priced at a higher rate. Furthermore, an ecotax policy package can include revenue recycling to reduce or eliminate any regressivity; an increase in an ecotax could be more than offset by a decrease in a (regressive) payroll or consumption tax. Some proponents claim a second benefit of increased employment or lower health care costs as the market and society adjust to the new fiscal policy (these claims, as with the claim "tax cuts create jobs," are often difficult to prove or disprove even after the fact).

Furthermore, pollution and other forms of environmental harm are often felt more acutely by the poor, who cannot "buy their way out" of being receptors of air pollution, water pollution, etc. Such losses, although externalities, have real economic welfare impacts. Thus by reducing environmental harm, such instruments have a progressive effect.

[edit] Ecotax policies enacted

Environmental Law
Eco-taxes
Environmental impact assessment
Intergenerational Equity
International environmental law
Polluter pays principle
Precautionary principle
Public trust doctrine
Sustainable development


An ecotax has been enacted in Germany by means of three laws in 1998, 1999 and 2002. The first introduced a tax on electricity and petroleum, at variable rates based on environmental considerations; renewable sources of electricity are not taxed. The second adjusted the taxes to favor efficient conventional power plants. The third increased the tax on petroleum. At the same time, income taxes were reduced proportionally so that the total tax burden remained constant.

[edit] Registration taxes

The Netherlands, Portugal, UK and Finland have introduced differentiations into their car registration taxes to encourage car buyers to opt for the cleanest car models.

In the Netherlands, the new registration taxes, payable when a car is sold to its first buyer, can earn the owner of a hybrid a discount up to €6000.

Austria has had a registration tax based on fuel consumption for several years.

See also : Vehicle registration plate

[edit] See also

[edit] References

  1. ^ BBC NEWS | UK | Green taxes 'would hit poor most'


[edit] External links