User:EaglesFanInTampa/Archive6

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Contents

[edit] Salem County Routes

I finally finished the shields on List of county routes in Salem County, New Jersey —Preceding unsigned comment added by Carpetmaster101 (talk • contribs) 03:21, 27 February 2008 (UTC)

[edit] U.S. Roads Newsletter, Issue 1

The U.S. Roads WikiProject Newsletter
Volume 2, Issue 1 • January 19, 2007 • About the Newsletter
Departments
Features
State and national updates
Archives • Newsroom • Full Issue • Shortcut: WP:USRD/NEWS
Want to help on next month's newsletter? Don't want to receive these in future? Want to change your method of delivery? – It's all here. —Mitch32contribs 20:05, 19 January 2008 (UTC)

[edit] PASH discussion

See here. --Son (talk) 16:11, 12 February 2008 (UTC)

[edit] USRD Newsletter - Issue 2

The U.S. Roads WikiProject Newsletter
Volume 2, Issue 2 • 17 February 2008 • About the Newsletter
Departments
Features
State and national updates
Archives • Newsroom • Full Issue • Shortcut: WP:USRD/NEWS
Want to help on next month's newsletter? Don't want to receive these in future? Want to change your method of delivery? – It's all here. —O bot (t • c) 03:25, 17 February 2008 (UTC)

[edit] I-275 (FL)

I thouhgt the rule is to only list most major junctions in infobox. This rule applies to California State Highways. For ex. on SR-91 in CA we can only list the I-605, I-5, and I-15 on routebox. Don't different states have different rules, and also on SR-39 in CA we can only list the I-5 and I-10, I thought every routes in US applies the same rule. And also, isn't User:Master Son an admin? Don't you get paid working on Wiki because I don't get paid. Don't admin get money send home from contribs on Wiki?--Freewayguy (Webmails) 01:19, 4 March 2008 (UTC)

Right, I understand that, but from what I understand the rules to be, Interstates can only have other interstates (which you forgot I-375 in your trim-down, BTW), unless having US Routes keeps the jct list below 10 jcts, the maximum allowed, in which case they can be included. Maybe I'm wrong, I have been before, but that's my understanding of the rules for infoboxes.
I'm not quite sure about Master Son because I've only worked with him maybe once or twice here on WP. However, I don't get paid (and if there's money to be had, how do I get it?) nor do I know why you even brought that up (if you're trying to infer I'm somehow related to Master Son, I'm not...never met him and wouldn't even know what he looked like if he punched me in the face; friendly advice, if that's what you're trying to infer, be very careful accusing people of being sock puppets when they're not...it causes a lot of drama that's not needed. And no, I'm not an admin, nor do I want the responsibility. But, if neither of those were what you were trying to infer, let me know so I know what you're asking).
Irregardless of whatever point you were trying to make there, that's how I interpret it, so if something's changed, please find me something so I know how to proceed in the future. Thanks! EaglesFanInTampa 14:03, 4 March 2008 (UTC)

[edit] USRD Newsletter - Issue 3

The U.S. Roads WikiProject Newsletter
Volume 2, Issue 3 • 22 March 2008 • About the Newsletter
Departments
Features
State and national updates
Archives • Newsroom • Full Issue • Shortcut: WP:USRD/NEWS
Want to help on next month's newsletter? Don't want to receive these in future? Want to change your method of delivery? – It's all here. —О бот (т • ц) 21:28, 22 March 2008 (UTC)

[edit] McGuire Air Force Base

Hello EaglesFanInTampa and let me begin by saying I agree with you concerning the McGuire Air Force Base and Current Events and of course your on-going edit war with 132.18.128.6 However, if you do not mind too much, I would like to invoke IAR and say; One, this information does no harm. Two, it does add to the article. Three; It is informative, and could honestly see this separating Wikipedia from the normal encyclopedia, in that we, versus paper print products, can bring up-to-date information, to the public. Hope you understand my reasoning not to revert 132.18.128.6 edits. Thanks. ShoesssS Talk 20:14, 24 March 2008 (UTC)

Hey there. I understand your reasons behind letting it go, and I'm willing to just let some other editor deal with it and move on with my day. However, there's some things we need to realize w/this IP and what they're doing. From their talk page, it appears they have made some not-so-constructive edits in the past. I shouldn't assume that, especially since it's an IP, what happened before is the intent they want to do it with now, but it's something to consider. Also, while I understand your argument about the flexibility of Wikipedia and how it's online so it can be up-to-date, if we allow "Upcoming Events" advertisements (it's nothing more than that, wouldn't you agree?) we'd have to allow every article that deals with a place to announce their parades, bake sales, and bingo nights, wouldn't we? I agree with you that we shouldn't be a stickler on the rules (Lord knows I'm not), but there needs to be some boundaries, and I feel that allowing something like this could snowball in a direction we don't need to head. Like I said, I don't care anymore what happens on that page, but I wanted to let you know why I feel what I was doing was right. Thanks nonetheless for your input and have a fantastic day! EaglesFanInTampa 20:33, 24 March 2008 (UTC)
Hey EaglesFanInTampa, by the way - Hopefully next year!. as I said in my opening remarks, I understand and agree on your points. To be honest, that is why I have not got involved, and just watched from the sidelines :-). I guess I just wanted to feel important today and see if we thought about everything. Take care and thank you for the well wishes. ShoesssS Talk 20:43, 24 March 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Al Lang edits

We seem to have been working on the article at the same time. I think I merged your edits into the final version, but I'm not sure I got 'em all so you might want to check. Sorry about that... Zeng8r (talk) 14:23, 28 March 2008 (UTC)