Talk:Eadbald of Kent

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Featured article star Eadbald of Kent is a featured article; it (or a previous version of it) has been identified as one of the best articles produced by the Wikipedia community. Even so, if you can update or improve it, please do.
September 29, 2007 Featured article candidate Promoted
This article is within the scope of the following WikiProjects:

[edit] New family tree

I'm not convinced the new tree is an improvement, though I understand the old one was a little small and hard to read. I guess I'll wait and see if anyone else has a preference.

If we're going to keep the new one, there are a couple of errors on it that do need fixing, and a couple of stylistic changes I'd suggest.

  • "Anna King of East Anglia" -- I would suggest a comma after "Anna"; I think that's the usual way to do it.
  • "Eomenred" should be "Eormenred"
  • "Seaxbufh" should be "Seaxburh"
  • "Hlother" should be "Hlothhere"
  • "Eormenhil" should be "Eormenhild"

Personally I would also suggest making the background white, instead of that checkered grey and white. I also think it would be better to make the text upper and lower case, instead of all upper case. Just my two cents. Mike Christie (talk) 02:31, 15 January 2008 (UTC)

It's not "checkered". It's transparent, and thus show the background image (which is indeed checkered, a tradition borrowed from graphic editing program). I asked for a SVG version because tehse resize more easily (and gifs are notorious for quirky resizes). I'll ask Sagredo (talk · contribs) to make the corrections. Circeus (talk) 17:08, 15 January 2008 (UTC)

http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Eadbald_of_Kent&action=submit Editing Talk:Eadbald of Kent - Preview - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Thanks for explaining the apparent checkered effect. I'd wondered about that; I saw it in another image and was baffled when I realized it didn't show up in the article display. Good point on the resizes -- I have seen that problem and I agree it's worth fixing. One other question: do you think it adds value to have the lines blue and the text black? I find it a bit distracting, but that may just be because I made the old image so I have preset expectations. Mike Christie (talk) 00:03, 16 January 2008 (UTC)
Got the spelling changes. Actually I expected some sooner. White background is easy. All caps is a little easier to read in a small image/thumbnail. Look at "of" Not a big deal to change, basically typing, but typing isn't my thing. You'd want to proof read it carefully again. Or give me a list so I can cut and paste. Blue vs black, another easy change, it just looked kind of boring to me in all black. (Family Colors, perhaps?)

What about:


ANNA,
KING OF
EAST ANGLIA

(different line break placement?) Let me know. Sagredo⊙☿♀♁♂♃♄ 01:19, 16 January 2008 (UTC)

My graphics ability is pretty much zero, and I have no visual sense, so I think we should go with whatever you think looks best. Thanks for doing this, by the way. And I really like your user name; I used that handle myself on LambdaMOO, once, a long time ago, and found myself talking to a chair of a university philosophy department as a result. Mike Christie (talk) 01:23, 16 January 2008 (UTC)
I looked at the article and realized that it should match the other diagram, and so changed it to all black. Some do use color. Sagredo⊙☿♀♁♂♃♄ 06:23, 16 January 2008 (UTC)