Talk:Durabrand

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Durabrand article.
Please sign and date your posts by typing four tildes (~~~~). Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic. New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Ask questions, get answers. This is not a forum for general discussion about the article's subject.	Be polite Assume good faith No personal attacks Be welcoming	Article policies No original research Neutral point of view Verifiability

[edit] Merge

I'm on the fence about the merge with List of Wal-Mart brands, leaning towards an oppose. This article, unlike many other articles on Wal-Mart brands, actually is fairly substantial. Compare this to others like HomeTrends or Faded Glory, which are going through WP:PROD to get waxed. So I think that this one could stand on its own, and am not entirely favorable to a merge. SchuminWeb (Talk) 16:27, 24 August 2006 (UTC)

[edit] You just...

Took my words out of my mouth. This article should NOT be merged whatsoever. It is a BRAND. Like Sony, Panasonic, Philips, Coby, whatever, it is a BRAND. Even though it's a sub-brand of Wal-Mart, that doesn't mean make an article of wal-Mart brands. Would it make sense to make an article of all of T.I.'s songs? No, because that defeats the purpose of an encyclopedia. You look up something and you get information about it. You don't type in a keyword and find lists of sub-categories, that would make an INDEX. -Anom8trw8 8/25/06

[edit] I would like to add external links

I have found a tech support site that is listed #1 when you search Durabrand Support on Google, I believe it could be a great source for some costumers who have problems with Durabrand products. Let me know if you have any thoughts.

I wouldn't add it. SchuminWeb (Talk) 12:38, 18 April 2007 (UTC)

Can you please be more specific? its got great content and it would help costumers with support problem.
I also believe it would put this article in a high position when you search Durabrand Support since not too many site have content about it. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 217.132.157.198 (talk • contribs)

It's basically advertising. According to WP:SPAM: Adding external links to an article or user page for the purpose of promoting a website or a product is not allowed, and is considered to be spam. In a nutshell, please don't add it, or we'll have to revert it. SchuminWeb (Talk) 14:45, 19 April 2007 (UTC)