Talk:Dunder Mifflin/GA1
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
[edit] GA Review
GA review – see WP:WIAGA for criteria
- Is it reasonably well written?
- A. Prose quality:
- B. MoS compliance:
- A minor issue: references should be placed after all punctuation, such as in the infobox.
- A. Prose quality:
- Is it factually accurate and verifiable?
- A. References to sources:
- Format the references so that they include at least the title, URL, publisher, and accessdate.
- This is done. Daniel Case (talk) 05:27, 5 June 2008 (UTC)
- Format the references so that they include at least the title, URL, publisher, and accessdate.
- B. Citation of reliable sources where necessary:
- C. No original research:
- A. References to sources:
- Is it broad in its coverage?
- A. Major aspects:
- B. Focused:
- A. Major aspects:
- Is it neutral?
- Fair representation without bias:
- Fair representation without bias:
- Is it stable?
- No edit wars, etc:
- No edit wars, etc:
- Does it contain images to illustrate the topic?
- A. Images are copyright tagged, and non-free images have fair use rationales:
- B. Images are provided where possible and appropriate, with suitable captions:
- However, I would suggest using the default thumbnail size for all of the images, rather than forcing one.
- This is done now too. Daniel Case (talk) 05:27, 5 June 2008 (UTC)
- However, I would suggest using the default thumbnail size for all of the images, rather than forcing one.
- A. Images are copyright tagged, and non-free images have fair use rationales:
- Overall:
- Pass or Fail:
- Pass or Fail:
Gary King (talk) 18:06, 1 June 2008 (UTC)
-
- Several references are still missing a publisher.
- "The actual DMI ticker symbol" reference should also use cite web, but you can keep the text preceding the URL.
- All done now. Daniel Case (talk) 05:28, 5 June 2008 (UTC)
- Gary King (talk) 17:20, 4 June 2008 (UTC)
-
-
- "on June 4, 2008., the intranet.}}" — an extra }} there?
- References 1 and 14 are missing publishers.
-
