Talk:Dromornithidae

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Dromornithidae article.

Article policies
Peer review Dromornithidae has had a peer review by Wikipedia editors which is now archived. It may contain ideas you can use to improve this article.
Dromornithidae was a good article nominee, but did not meet the good article criteria at the time. There are suggestions below for improving the article. Once these are addressed, the article can be renominated. Editors may also seek a reassessment of the decision if they believe there was a mistake.

Reviewed version: April 3, 2006

Flag
Portal
Dromornithidae is within the scope of WikiProject Australia, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of Australia and Australia-related topics. If you would like to participate, visit the project page.
B This article has been rated as b-class on the quality scale.
??? This article has not yet received a rating on the importance scale.
WikiProject Birds Dromornithidae is part of WikiProject Birds, an attempt at creating a standardized, informative and easy-to-use ornithological resource. If you would like to participate, visit the project page. Please do not substitute this template.
B This article has been rated as b-Class on the quality scale.
Low This article has been rated as low-importance on the importance scale.

[edit] Mihirungs?

  • "Mihirung" seems to be a pretty common name for these birds, and the current article Mihirung is just a short stub. Maybe this page should be moved to Mihirung, given the guideline to use common names as titles rahter than scientific names where possible. Either that or Demon Ducks of Doom...Dinoguy2 06:40, 16 January 2006 (UTC)
    • Hmm, I don't know. Google shows over 650 hits for "Dromornithidae", but just over 150 for Mihirung. The Mihirung article is uselss as it is and should probably be made a redirect to Dromornithidae... I'll do that if you don't object. Mstroeck 13:14, 23 January 2006 (UTC)
      • Sounds good to me.Dinoguy2 16:30, 23 January 2006 (UTC)
        • Done.Mstroeck 01:24, 24 January 2006 (UTC)

[edit] .

i like the article, but some of the sentences are choppy (short), kinda like 3rd grade stuff. i would prefer it if someone made the sentences look as if it was written by a professional. but still, even without them, the article is pretty sweet!

[edit] Failed GA

A reference dump at the end of the article just doesn't do it for me. Needs in-line citations. I like the organization, though. savidan(talk) (e@) 04:25, 3 April 2006 (UTC)