User talk:Drhimnisfier
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
[edit] Speedy deletion of Jamie sutherland
Please refrain from introducing inappropriate pages such as Jamie sutherland, to Wikipedia. Doing so is not in accordance with our policies. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox.
If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the article does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that a copy be emailed to you. AndrewWTaylor (talk) 21:02, 2 May 2008 (UTC)
[edit] AfD nomination of Sausage surprise
An article that you have been involved in editing, Sausage surprise, has been listed for deletion. If you are interested in the deletion discussion, please participate by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sausage surprise. Thank you. Do you want to opt out of receiving this notice? BelovedFreak 21:45, 4 May 2008 (UTC)
[edit] May 2008
Please do not add content without citing reliable sources, as you did to Hollyoaks. Before making potentially controversial edits, it is recommended that you discuss them first on the article's talk page. If you are familiar with Wikipedia:Citing sources please take this opportunity to add references to the article. Contact me if you need assistance adding references. Thank you. ~~ [Jam][talk] 22:02, 4 May 2008 (UTC)
Welcome to Wikipedia. Please do not remove Articles for deletion notices from articles, or remove other people's comments in Articles for deletion debates, as you did with Sausage surprise. Otherwise, it may be difficult to create consensus. If you oppose the deletion of an article, please comment at the respective page instead. Thank you. BelovedFreak 17:51, 5 May 2008 (UTC)
Please do not add unsourced or original content, as you did to Hollyoaks. Doing so violates Wikipedia's verifiability policy. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. ~~ [Jam][talk] 20:34, 5 May 2008 (UTC)
Hi, the recent edit you made to Stacey Branning has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thanks. treelo talk 11:53, 7 May 2008 (UTC)
The recent edit you made to Sean Slater constitutes vandalism, and has been reverted. Please do not continue to vandalize pages; use the sandbox for testing. Thanks. treelo talk 11:56, 7 May 2008 (UTC))
Please do not vandalize pages, as you did with this edit to Gus Smith. If you continue to do so, you will be blocked from editing. treelo talk 11:58, 7 May 2008 (UTC)
This is the last warning you will receive for your disruptive edits, such as the one you made to Ted Paige.
Any further vandalism will result in your being blocked from editing Wikipedia. Magioladitis (talk) 21:32, 12 May 2008 (UTC)
Posted nonsense page Hum hum de dum after above warnings. NawlinWiki (talk) 18:01, 14 May 2008 (UTC)
