User talk:Dragon guy

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Why did you revert the biscuit article? —Preceding unsigned comment added by Pennybiscuit (talkcontribs) 15:06, 23 February 2007

First of all, I can't message you back if you don't sign your post, and second, I reverted it from an article about someone's dog, which is hardly relavent to anyone but the owner of the dog and some people they know, to the original article about the food item, an article that belongs in an encyclopedia.Dragon guy 03:42, 26 February 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Welcome!

Hello, Dragon guy, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome!  --WikiSlasher 07:00, 26 February 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Which part of "Clocks" reference needs a citation?

In your recent edit to Daylight saving time, why do you think Coldplay's song needs a citation? The song has a Wikipedia page already. The fact that Martin is Willett's great-great grandson is already documented in the Wikipedia page for him. Eubulides 17:15, 10 March 2007 (UTC)

The Chris Martin entry already has a seemingly-reliable citation to the effect that Martin is Willett's great-great grandson. If you don't believe that citation, I Googled around and found a speech by Lord Tanslaw before the House of Lords saying the same thing. Perhaps these sources are both wrong, but it seems unlikely. The connection to Willett is what makes this cultural reference particularly apropos; I wouldn't want to omit it if it's true. Eubulides 02:03, 12 March 2007 (UTC)
While we're on the subject of that citation, I would like to shoehorn in a reference to the Grammy award business, as it's a nice counterpoint to Guy Lombardo's performance being #1 in 1931. It's nice to keep track of how popular a particular cultural reference is, since we need to keep pruning this section. The old text was verbose, though; I'll come up with a less-intrusive way to say it. Eubulides 02:07, 12 March 2007 (UTC)