Talk:Dragon Half

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Anime and manga, which aims to improve and expand anime and manga related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can edit this article or visit the project page.
Start This article has been rated as Start-Class on the assessment scale.

Contents

[edit] Trivia

Move from article:

It is true that president of the company that published Dragon Half was caught using illegal drugs, but this was not the reason the series was short lived. The Dragon Half anime only ran for two episodes because it did not generate enough interest to continue the series.

RJFJR 20:20, 23 December 2005 (UTC)

I still say this is Interesting Trivia. Maybe it would be an idea to add the following to the Trivia section.

  • It if often believed that the Series's short run was due to drug charges. However while it is true that president of the company that published Dragon Half was caught using illegal drugs, this was not the reason the series was short lived. The Dragon Half anime only ran for two episodes because it did not generate enough interest to continue the series.


[edit] Add info from the manga?

This article only seems to give information about the OVA, and nothing about how long the manga ran, the plot of the manga, the number of issues, or ANYTHING about the manga. I would think the manga information would be more important than the OVA since the OVA was only 2 episodes long. Sabishii Kouen 04:44, 28 May 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Reversion

Given that some jerk vandalized the characters section by changing the names to various Nintendo characters, I have reverted to a much older version. Jtrainor (talk) 09:12, 29 February 2008 (UTC)

[edit] In universe perspective

An editor removed the "in universe" tag, without addressing the issue: see WP:WAF and WP:CYF. I will assume that the editor intends a re-write of the to bring a more proper perspective and tone to the article. Otherwise the material will be tagged again until it is corrected. GundamsЯus (talk) 16:53, 29 February 2008 (UTC)

I think it is just good practices to remove cleanup tags after the problems has been resolved, but not before. --Farix (Talk) 17:31, 29 February 2008 (UTC)
It's silly to tag this since by fixing the vandalism, I had to undo months worth of improvements and changes to the article. Presumably the guy who has been working on this will readd them. Jtrainor (talk) 19:13, 29 February 2008 (UTC)
I am not sure I understand your reasoning. You are aparently acknowledging that the article needs to be cleaned up and also aparently stating that you are not intending to clean it up in the near future yourself and also aparently stating that you removed the clean up tag because you presume that someone else will eventually be returning to do the needed clean up? That does not seem like very valid rationale for removing a clean up tag. GundamsЯus (talk) 20:07, 29 February 2008 (UTC)