User talk:Dpascoe88
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Please do not remove content from Wikipedia, as you did to Liberty University. It is considered vandalism. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. -- Cat Whisperer 03:27, 25 December 2006 (UTC)
what is the purpose of people being able to edit then? have you any idea who i am? i could be an official student recruiter for all you know, and you're telling me i can't edit the information?
- I'm telling you that you can't just delete entire sections of the article (e.g., SEC investigation, non-tenured faculty, the "Liberty Way", funding by Sun Myung Moon) just because you don't like the way they reflect on Liberty University. And you can't falsify the rating given by U.S. News and World Report [1]. And it doesn't matter if you are an official student recruiter or Jerry Falwell himself. -- Cat Whisperer 12:31, 25 December 2006 (UTC)
Please do not remove content from Wikipedia, as you did to Liberty University. It is considered vandalism. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Sagaciousuk (talk) 04:23, 25 December 2006 (UTC)
Who exactly chooses what is written then? Yeah, there have been controversies, but thats not a major attribution of the University. You don't publish the fact that william and mary has the highest on campus suicide and rape rates among all US college campuses, or the tasering controversies at UCLA. You should let those who know Liberty University best write about Liberty University.
[edit] Your falsification of information about the U.S. News ranking of Liberty University
Please stop. If you continue to vandalize pages by deliberately introducing incorrect information, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. -- Cat Whisperer 22:56, 27 December 2006 (UTC)
