User talk:Dom56!

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Contents

April 2007

Please do not introduce any form of vandalism to the userpages of other users, as you did to User:Luigi30. Thank you. —DerHexer (Talk) 16:45, 20 April 2007 (UTC)

This is your last warning.
The next time you create an inappropriate page such as Free toast., you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. NawlinWiki 17:32, 23 April 2007 (UTC)

This is your last warning.
The next time you vandalize a page, as you did to Free toast., you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Improbcat 17:34, 23 April 2007 (UTC)

Your recent edit to John Prescott (diff) was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to recognize and repair vandalism to Wikipedia articles. If the bot reverted a legitimate edit, please accept my humble creator's apologies – if you bring it to the attention of the bot's owner, we may be able to improve its behavior. Click here for frequently asked questions about the bot and this warning. // MartinBot 17:46, 23 April 2007 (UTC)

I'm scared

  • Regarding your creation of hte page I'm scared, grow up. Improbcat 17:48, 23 April 2007 (UTC)
You have been indefinitely blocked from editing in accordance with Wikipedia's blocking policy for repeated abuse of editing privileges. If you believe this block is unjustified you may contest this block by adding the text {{unblock|your reason here}} below.

--Guinnog 17:49, 23 April 2007 (UTC)

This blocked user (block log | autoblocks | rangeblocks | unblock | contribs | deleted contribs) has asked to be unblocked, but an administrator has reviewed and declined this request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy). Do not remove this unblock request while you are blocked.

Request reason: "I'm only being stupid, I don't mean it, I just wanted a laugh."

Decline reason: "We don't want people who think vandalism is funny. — Yamla 17:56, 23 April 2007 (UTC)"

Please make any further unblock requests by using the {{unblock}} template. However, abuse of the template may result in your talk page being protected.

This blocked user (block log | autoblocks | rangeblocks | unblock | contribs | deleted contribs) has asked to be unblocked, but an administrator has reviewed and declined this request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy). Do not remove this unblock request while you are blocked.

Request reason: "I don't like vandalism. PLease give me a second chance, I'm a reformer. I helped create the page about Spiro Moisiu. Have mercy!"

Decline reason: "As per below, you are either being dishonest now, or you are a sockpuppet. Either way, nothing of use has come from this account. Denied. — IrishGuy talk 19:40, 23 April 2007 (UTC)"

Please make any further unblock requests by using the {{unblock}} template. However, abuse of the template may result in your talk page being protected.

Where did you create the page about Spiro Moisiu? It says that page was created by User:Reevesgla1919. However after Reevesgla1919 was blocked for repeatedly creating the free toast page, and for sockpupperty, you started claiming you [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Luigi30&diff=prev&oldid=124393324 were friends of reevesgla1919 . Now you claim to have created the page he created. Looks like this account is just another sock puppet of reevesgla1919 and a very good reason to keep you blocked. Improbcat 18:14, 23 April 2007 (UTC)

{{unblock|I HELPED create the page about Spiro Moisiu, don't you understand? I'm trying to help wiki, and al you do is block me!}

I am a sock puppet! Ho ho ho ho ho ho! I'm gonna help Wiki by cleaning up vandalism.

Guys09 07:24, 24 April 2007 (UTC)

Please unblock me. I'm going to reform. Please, I'm not a sock puppet. Dom56! 09:32, 24 April 2007 (UTC)

Your username appears nowhere in the history of Spiro Moisiu I posted above. So once again, you are still either being dishonest or a sock puppet. Also you have contributed nothing but nonsense and vandalism, why should we believe you will do differently now? Improbcat 19:58, 24 April 2007 (UTC)

For goodness' sake, I HELPED to make the page about Spiro Moisiu. I didn't create it, I HELPED to create it. Please, don't you understand this. Dom56! 12:36, 25 April 2007 (UTC)

Sockpuppetry

This user appears to be using sock puppets to circumvent a ban. Suspected accounts are Guys09, Toast123 and the blocked account Dr. Reeves. A ticket to investigate these suspected sock puppets has been submitted. Improbcat 14:35, 25 April 2007 (UTC)


No, you are a vandal acting incredibly immaturely. -Improbcat 16:44, 25 April 2007 (UTC)

I'm not a vandal, I'm just a kid trying to enjoy my childhood. I'm trying to have fun. How dare you guys! 12:43, 26 April 2007 (UTC)

Expire please?

Please unblock him, he's not so bad. Surely, if you unblock him,and if he's bad again, indefinately block him again. Please give this a go, he may be able to contribute positively to this fantastic enyclopedia. Please reply back, admin, Sorryforvandals 12:29, 7 May 2007 (UTC)

I agree. If the admin agree to unblock me, then I swear, I will do some great stuff. I plan to get myself a swanky new home page, and all. I'll be good, I swear. Dom56! 15:31, 8 May 2007 (UTC)

Good troll or bad troll?

Can you be good?

Anyway, was User:Dom58! your puppet? Mathiastck 19:36, 28 May 2007 (UTC)

I am not a crook...

I am a sock puppeteer, I admit it. But, I am not the boss of Dom58!. I don't no who he is, Da and I think it wrong to penalise this Dom58! just because he is called Dom. Many nice people are called Dom. Listen to this. I don't expect to be unblocked after the terrible crimes I have committed on this account, but the Dom58! account is not a sock puppet of mine. I don't want to be linked to a innocent person, when I am a cruel, twisted idiot who deserves to be banned for the rest of my life. Dom56! 15:31, 4 June 2007 (UTC)