Talk:Dmitry Merezhkovsky

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Dmitry Merezhkovsky is part of the WikiProject Russian history, a collaborative effort to improve Wikipedia's coverage of Russian history. If you would like to participate, you can visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks.
??? This article has not yet received a rating on the quality scale.
??? This article has not yet received a rating on the importance scale.
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography. For more information, visit the project page.
Start This article has been rated as Start-Class on the project's quality scale. [FAQ]
This page is within the scope of WikiProject Russia. If you would like to participate, please join the project and help with our open tasks.
Start This article has been rated as Start-Class on the assessment scale.
Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the assessment scale.

[edit] Please stop removing relevant elink

This link is quite relevant. It is a interview by DM with PiƂsudski, which contains a lot of DM comments - actually the text spoken by P. forms a minority of the interview. According to WP:EL this is a relevant link and I see no reason why it should be removed.--Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus Talk 19:23, 14 June 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Please stop removing relevant connection

I do not understand why Merezhkovsky's involvement with mystical anarchism was removed, without even a note on the Talk page. I've reverted it and added more informationa bout Mr M.s politcial career.Harrypotter 13:35, 9 July 2006 (UTC)

It would be good if you could add inline citation to back up your claim. And from my experience, Ghirla rarely comments on talk, unfortunately. Of course maybe we will get lucky this time...--Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus Talk 15:49, 9 July 2006 (UTC)

Thanks for your comment. I have provided an elucidation. I wont hold my breath for a stroke of luck!Harrypotter 16:21, 9 July 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Names and dates of novels probably not currently correct in article

See article from 1911 Britannica - Jmabel | Talk 03:19, 25 October 2006 (UTC)