Talk:Divine language
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
 |
This article is supported by WikiProject Mythology .
This project provides a central approach to Mythology-related subjects on Wikipedia. |
|
| Start | This article has been rated as Start-Class on the Project's quality scale. (If you rated the article please give a short summary at comments to explain the ratings and/or to identify the strengths and weaknesses.) |
|
[edit] Arabic
It is worth noting that Arabic is the original language of the Quran, and, since the Quran is the eternal word of God according to most Islamic scholars, it logically follows that Arabic is God's own language. Aminullah 14:16, 13 August 2007 (UTC)
- You are in error, because Proto-Indo-European was instead both Divine/Adamic according to Anne Catherine Emmerich's Catholic private revelations: http://www.wikinfo.org/index.php/Adamic_language God currently uses confused tongues to communicate with us, but this situation is only temporary: [1] Wikinger 10:53, 19 August 2007 (UTC)
-
- So maybe this Proto-Indo-European was simply other name for Arabic. It would satisfy both Christians and Muslims. 83.21.51.90 (talk) 18:25, 24 December 2007 (UTC)
-
-
- Confused Arabic words are derived from unconfused Proto-Indo-European words. For example. PIE *appa- and *amma- are original forms of Arabic "abu" and "umm" which on both sides means "father" and "mother". It is possible to find PIE and Semitic pairs of words that are nearly identical both in sounding and meaning. Proof of this fact that is based on Anne Catherine Emmerich's Catholic private revelations is explained here: http://www.wikinfo.org/index.php/Adamic_language Wikinger (talk) 17:57, 24 December 2007 (UTC)
-
-
-
-
- I read Emmerich's revelations and they are free from porn, frivolity and contradictions, so now I am convinced that they come from God. It seems that your religion is the true one and I was in error. 83.21.51.90 (talk) 18:25, 24 December 2007 (UTC)
-
-
-
-
-
-
- Even God as depicted by Anne Catherine Emmerich in Image:Holy_Trinity_scheme.svg is really only One, but Compound God because He is consisted of three concentrically placed fully spherical and unseparatable Persons. Each Person is sharing relevant common part of own volume with volume of another Persons inside God. Catholic Bible of course is true, but omits many important details that are available in Catholic private revelations such as Emmerich's ones. Jesus as God Incarnated is a concentrical sum of abovementioned Compound One God in Three Persons, human soul and human body, with common middle in middle of His human head. Wikinger (talk) 18:38, 24 December 2007 (UTC)
- Thank you! 83.21.51.90 (talk) 21:21, 24 December 2007 (UTC)
- Even God as depicted by Anne Catherine Emmerich in Image:Holy_Trinity_scheme.svg is really only One, but Compound God because He is consisted of three concentrically placed fully spherical and unseparatable Persons. Each Person is sharing relevant common part of own volume with volume of another Persons inside God. Catholic Bible of course is true, but omits many important details that are available in Catholic private revelations such as Emmerich's ones. Jesus as God Incarnated is a concentrical sum of abovementioned Compound One God in Three Persons, human soul and human body, with common middle in middle of His human head. Wikinger (talk) 18:38, 24 December 2007 (UTC)
-
-
-
