Talk:Disney Subliminal Messages

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Disney Subliminal Messages article.

Article policies

Contents

[edit] NPOV

There are a lot of anti-Disney groups on the web and this appears to be put forward by someone with some level of affiliation, certainly NPOV. Toddst1 02:48, 30 October 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Sources

I believe we need some POV check here. Snopes is a rumor site. Toddst1 02:54, 30 October 2007 (UTC)

I have tried reverted this page to earlier versions as it seems that Toddst1 appears to have a touchy pro-Disney bias. Much of the previous information seems potentially valid and definitely not anti-Disney. People should at least be given an opportunity to attempt to give appropriate source citation, but Toddst1 is blocking all attempts at improving this article. Snopes may be a rumor site, but it cites sources more effectively than many "non-rumor" sites available on the internet that are acceptable to Wikipedia editors. --Nilast 21:31, 30 October 2007 (UTC)

I don't think I am. I have no affiliation with Disney or ALL and am glad for you to follow Wikipedia's guidelines. I'll also be glad to add the NPOV check back. I see that you're a newcomer to Wikipedia with 7 edits. Please feel free to ask for help. Toddst1 21:37, 30 October 2007 (UTC)

I give. There is no point in attempting to edit this page when the content doesn't stay put long enough to check sources or deal with the point of view issues. In its current state a stub tag may need to be added. --Nilast 22:03, 30 October 2007 (UTC)

[edit] What are the messages?

The article states that images are quickly flashed, and describes some of the images. What are the subliminal messages that these images are supposed to convey? It's all innuendo without stating them. Toddst1 02:57, 30 October 2007 (UTC)

[edit] NPOV addressed

I've made some major edits, both copyedit and content edit, hopefully addressing the NPOV issue. Note that the original author has been blocked. Please explain edits that may appear controversial both with an edit summary and on this talk page. Thanks. Toddst1 21:25, 30 October 2007 (UTC)

[edit] NPOV apparently not addressed

I've added the POV check back (see above). Toddst1 21:51, 30 October 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Snopes

Snopes site explain all claims. Kage Tenshi 07 November 2007