Talk:Disney.com
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
 |
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Disney, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to articles on Disney on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion. |
| Stub | This article has been rated as stub-Class on the quality scale. |
| High | This article has been rated as high-importance on the importance scale. |
| If you have rated this article please consider adding assessment comments. |
Contents |
[edit] FAQish
The entire article (particularly the Disney XD section) seems FAQish, for example it says "Disney XD (short for Xtreme Digital) is a new service of Disney.com that lets members communicate and interact with each other with chat rooms that are limited to selected phrases and the ability to create your own Disney XD page, which are called channels." This assumes that the reader is actually using the site, I suggest we rewrite the section in a less FAQish manner. Eatspie (talk) 03:43, 10 March 2008 (UTC)
[edit] Notability
03-October-2006: OK, yes Disney.com is notable. However, as a formality, I added a paragraph noting that even back in April 1998, long before summer vacations that year, the web traffic on Disney.com exceeded unique web visitors to ABCNews.com by over 10%, and web traffic on Disney+Infoseek websites was 2nd only to leader Yahoo! that month. Consequently, now I am removing the top notability tag in the article Disney.com. -Wikid77 22:20, 3 October 2006 (UTC)
[edit] DXD
Shouldn't we talk about the new Disney.com with Disney DXD? Pahrak bionicle lover 01:27, 20 February 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Disney.com Suggestion
In this case, Disney.com should be moved to The Walt Disney Company. Creating a new Level 2 Headline with a brief discription (including Disney XD, features of the website, and etc.). Disney.com shouldn't really be one whole new subject unless this was a well-developed and well thought out (and of high importance) article.
Go for it. --AOL Alex 21:27, 17 September 2007 (UTC)
- I think it should stay separate. The online presence is very different than the company as a company. The company is far too vast for the parent article to list every one of its operations - it produces films and television shows, it runs resorts and theme parks, it has radio stations, various websites, toys, games, cartoon characters, etc. If we jumbled all of these into the main article it would be unmanageably long. The Disney website is independently notable, so from the point of organization it is better to keep it in its own article. That's a different issue than the fact that this article needs a thorough clean-up. The tag has been on here for a number of months with no action so I am removing it.Wikidemo (talk) 17:53, 1 January 2008 (UTC)
[edit] Does anyone know....
Does anyone know how to earn D-Points on Disney.com?? I have an account and don't know how to earn D-Points. Thank you!! —Preceding unsigned comment added by 76.1.34.22 (talk) 01:55, 21 January 2008 (UTC)
