Talk:Dismissal of U.S. attorneys controversy documents

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

[edit] Next Steps

  • Consider Chronological Order, oldest at top
  • Review various archives/repositories of released documents:
    • New York Times,
    • U.S. News & World Report,
    • U.S. Senate Judiciary Committee,
    • U.S. House Judiciary comittee,
    • Wall Street Journal,
    • Talking Points Media
    • Congressional Quarterly (not free)

* Add names of witnesses appearing for each date Y Done

-- Yellowdesk 06:09, 22 May 2007 (UTC)
Small suggestion: for transcripts of the hearings, put it under the date of the hearing, rather than "released" date -- Sholom 12:26, 22 May 2007 (UTC)
Y Done, in own section too - Yellowdesk
Another suggestion - include direct links to editorials written by the key players in the controversy (e.g., Gonzales's USA Today editorial on the affair and Iglesias's editorial on the controversy). Remember 16:04, 22 May 2007 (UTC)
Y Done Well, only a section started - Yellowdesk
  • Separate into a new section, correspondance and subpoenas, from documents produced by DOJ or White House. -- Yellowdesk 20:53, 22 May 2007 (UTC)
  • Check that the hearing dates are correct for the transcripts -- Yellowdesk 23:15, 22 May 2007 (UTC)