Talk:Dismissal (cricket)

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

	Cricket Portal Click here for information about how the WikiProject assesses notability Dismissal (cricket) is part of WikiProject Cricket which aims to expand and organise information better in articles related to the sport of cricket. Please participate by visiting the project page for more details.
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the quality scale.
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the importance scale.
Additional information: This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-Class status: Referencing and citation: not checked Coverage and accuracy: not checked Structure: not checked Grammar: not checked Supporting materials: not checked Categories and templates: not checked To fill out this checklist, please add the following to the template call: <!-- 1. It is suitably referenced, and all major points have appropriate inline citations. --> |B-Class-1=yes/no <!-- 2. It reasonably covers the topic, and does not contain major omissions or inaccuracies. --> |B-Class-2=yes/no <!-- 3. It has a defined structure, including a lead section and one or more sections of content. --> |B-Class-3=yes/no <!-- 4. It is free from major grammatical errors. --> |B-Class-4=yes/no <!-- 5. It contains appropriate supporting materials, such as an infobox, images, or diagrams. --> |B-Class-5=yes/no <!-- 6. It is fully and correctly categorised and carries all appropriate templates. --> |B-Class-6=yes/no

This category or article is part of WikiProject Cricket which aims to expand and organise information better in articles related to the sport of cricket. Please visit the project page for more details. Articles under this specific category will be listed at Wikipedia:WikiProject Cricket/Articles by WatchlistBot.

labas ka veiki as tai nieko gero.otu?

[edit] Anatomy vs body

This is posted to test a linguistic theory. What is the nationality of the person who used the abstract word "anatomy", instead of a concrete word like "body", in the article on dismissal? I hope someone comes along to answer. Axel 16:24, 25 March 2006 (UTC)

This was moved here from the article on cricket. The very first version [1] of this article contains two uses of the word. This was done by Larry Sanger who being an American could not have known much about the game and should have got it from elsewhere. So there is no way to answer your question. Tintin (talk) 16:39, 25 March 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Timed out/forfeit

Should the forfeit of the 4th test by Pakistan v England 2006 be in the section - ISTR they were deemed to have forfeited the game by not appearing on the field in time.

Apepper 15:01, 6 July 2007 (UTC)

No, because that was the outcome of a match rather than the dismissal of an individual batsman. Jmorrison230582 08:12, 22 July 2007 (UTC)

I thought the part of the forfeit section

In the case of extremely long delays, the umpires may forfeit the match to either team. This method of taking a wicket has never been employed in the history of Test cricket. However how long a delay is allowed before calling the game a forfeit, is still not known.

particularly the first sentence would make this a relavant example; ISTR that it was the delay of the Pakistan team appearing that caused the game to be forfeited to England - if not, what law gave the game to England?

Apepper 21:57, 28 July 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Commonness

Would it be possible to give a list of the methods in order of commonness (presumably for test and 1-day seperately if needed)? 128.232.228.174 (talk) 16:15, 9 June 2008 (UTC)