User talk:DIREKTOR

Home   Talk   Contributions   Archives

[edit] Mare Nostrum

Thanks mate. I'll have a look. Can't see it going through though. They'll say it's a notable concept that was part of Mussolini's thoughts and plans. I agree the content is awful though. AlasdairGreen27 (talk) 17:06, 22 May 2008 (UTC)

Congratulations on your successful deletion of this article. Where next? 619 in Ireland? Andy Dingley (talk) 09:47, 29 May 2008 (UTC)

This unilateral action is really out of order (and it’s not the first time either)

This is not the way we should do things

As the outcome is probably what I would have sought, I do not want my name attached to this kind of high-handedness

What you need to do is put things back the way they were, make a statement of intent, and set a reasonable deadline.

Xyl 54 (talk) 17:01, 30 May 2008 (UTC)

Thank you for that; I really didn't want to fall out over this. I've posted there as well, now. Xyl 54 (talk) 11:06, 31 May 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Agazio & Luigi 28

Buddy, both of these 'users' [1] [2] are PIO. Revert on sight. AlasdairGreen27 (talk) 19:06, 28 May 2008 (UTC)

Yeah, I'm getting together an RFCU now. AlasdairGreen27 (talk) 19:08, 28 May 2008 (UTC)

My name is Luigi. I can send to you my real name, my address and my telephone number. I don't know who is that PIO!--Luigi 28 (talk) 18:07, 4 June 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Chetniks

I first found it here http://srpskaistorija.livejournal.com/tag/serbian+nazi+cellaboration+massacre+of+m But there are ceveral sites where all this is mentioned. If you have some excess to OKW you can simply find it there.--(GriffinSB) (talk) 22:28, 28 May 2008 (UTC)

You're welcome.I'll try to find everything about the OKW tommarow.--(GriffinSB) (talk) 00:10, 29 May 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Tag/PIO

I don't mind at all. This matter (directly referring to you, by the way - a starring role, indeed), is already at WP:AN/I, subheading 'Violation'. AlasdairGreen27 (talk) 14:41, 29 May 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Gavrilo Princip

Hello,

I have left a message on the talk page for Gavrilo Princip and would be very grateful if you could spare a few moments to read it.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gavrilo_Princip

Thanks for your time.

harris 578 (talk) 20:30, 29 May 2008 (UTC)

[edit] RfC at Talk:List of infantry divisions of the Soviet Union 1917–1957

Mrg3105 has requested comment on the use of either 'Narodnoe Opolchenyie' or People's Militia for the Soviet 'home guard' divisions of World War II on this page. I'd appreciate your input. Personally I believe he is wrong, as WP:UE would indicate the use of People's Militia - and David Glantz has confirmed this as the correct English translation. Regards Buckshot06(prof) 00:23, 2 June 2008 (UTC)

[edit] The Military history WikiProject Newsletter : Issue XXVII (May 2008)

The May 2008 issue of the Military history WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.
This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 00:23, 3 June 2008 (UTC)

[edit] That crazy anon on wheels

Be careful DIREKTOR, you have actually reverted some good quality edits, of him and other anons. --PaxEquilibrium (talk) 17:02, 3 June 2008 (UTC)

 :D --PaxEquilibrium (talk) 19:34, 3 June 2008 (UTC)

look this and this :) --Rjecina 05:40, 5 June 2008 (UTC) —Preceding unsigned comment added by 212.91.99.205 (talk)

[edit] City Mayors of Rijeka

What kind of sources do you prefer? If you want, I can send to you two or three sources for every one name of City Mayor of Fiume: Internet sources (three of my prevous sources was from the Croatian site of Tourist Associtation of Rijeka, another one from the Historic Institute of Zagreb!!!!) or some books. You have some BIG, BIG problems with the historical sources. Here you can read my article about negationism of Holocaust[3]. Credo di poterti insegnare qualcosa che tu proprio non sai capire.--Luigi 28 (talk) 14:14, 5 June 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Propery reparation (Istrian Exodus)

I reverted the voice. Please, see the discussion page (with all the sources).--Luigi 28 (talk) 18:16, 6 June 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Istrian Exodus and English sources

Boys, the voice Istrian exodus today has 23 notes:

1. In Italian

2. In Italian and in Slovene

3/17. In English

18. Not found

19. In English

20. It's a map

21. In English

22. In Italian

23. In Italian

24. In Italian

25. In Croatian

26. In Italian (my source: the Treaty of Osimo)

27. In Italian (my source: a legal expertise about properties in ex Jugoslavia)

28/31. In English

32. In English (my source)

If you go in the talk page, you can find the explanation and translation of my sources (26, 27 and 32) in English[4].

Now: you wrote your regular false, about my sources. But you have to reverte the 1., 2., 18., 21., 22., 23., 24. and 25 edits!
Now I can respond your question: I'm a man.--Luigi 28 (talk) 13:01, 8 June 2008 (UTC)

[edit] re: Report

Absolutely: NO WAY! I'll revert everything!--Luigi 28 (talk) 17:49, 8 June 2008 (UTC)

I've seen your last edit of my talk page. Please, tell me: who wrote this words: "Luigi, like PIO, sees Wikipedia not as an encyclopedia but as a battleground, almost exclusively editing articles about Istria and Dalmatia, removing references that Italians may have been born in Istria or Dalmatia"? Is this a relevant info for the sockpuppeteering report? Also my defence. Another question: who wrote this: "If the question is 'incredibly smart or incredibly stupid', I'd go for option B"? I'm not PIO (and YOU know it) and I'm waiting for the check.--Luigi 28 (talk) 15:13, 11 June 2008 (UTC)

I don't like to repeat the same things, but for the last time: I want that an Admin (or two, three, four...) can see the personal war that you and mr Aladstair are conducting against me, only because you think I'm PIO. Do you like my last edit in Istria? I've spent more than three days to prepare it, and I think that is a very good job. What do you think about this[5]? Only Croatian sources, without ANY kind of translation, without ANY kind of English link... What a baaaaaad job, Ivan--Luigi 28 (talk) 19:12, 11 June 2008 (UTC)

...and what about my edit of Istria? Do you like it? And the 'very bad job of History of Dalmatia? It's very sad to see that the rules that you want for me, for you are nothing. La calunnia, è un venticeeeeello! (G.Rossini, Barbiere di Siviglia)[6]. Do you know this immortal masterpiece?--Luigi 28 (talk) 19:25, 11 June 2008 (UTC)

Look here[7]. You understand Italian, don't you, my highly intelligent friend?--Luigi 28 (talk) 19:30, 11 June 2008 (UTC)

[edit] PIO and the report

Mate, don't worry, there's a very good reason he's adopted such aggressive and poisonous tactics, as he well knows himself. It's made the SSP a very long report that looks like two sides arguing, but it'll come down to a check user report anyway. If he's edited from home on any occasion, as for sure he has from the evidence, then there's nothing his yelling and obfuscation can do to save him. As to when it'll get resolved, could be a day or two yet. AlasdairGreen27 (talk) 18:30, 8 June 2008 (UTC)

[edit] New thread at the Administrators' noticeboard

I have opened a thread at the Administrators' Noticeboard that directly concerns you. See Wikipedia:Administrators'_noticeboard#Request_for_more_eyes_on_and_a_speedy_close_to_Wikipedia:Suspected_sock_puppets.2FPIO_.283rd.29.
AlasdairGreen27 (talk) 22:12, 8 June 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Barnstar

		The Barnstar of Diligence
		For amazing dedication to Wikipedia and shock that none have yet awarded him a barnstar. PaxEquilibrium (talk) 15:51, 9 June 2008 (UTC)

Well Pax, you've single-handedly ruined my whole userpage concept. I have no idea where I'm gonna fit this thing! :P Thanx man :D

--DIREKTOR ^(TALK) 19:22, 9 June 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Pula

I've seen your last reversion of my edits [8]. Did I want to point out that in the same voice Pola...sorry: Pula are still present some bad Italian names to delete: Monte Zaro, Monte Serpente, Monte Ghiro, Monte Magno, Monte Paradiso, Monte Rizzi, Monte Vidal, Monteserpo, Lungomare, Quarnero, Porta Gemina, Valle, Bagnole, Barbanna (it's a mistake: the Italian name is Barbana), Brioni, Fasana, Gallesano, Lisignano, Medolino, Pomero, Promontore, Sissano, Stignano, Altura, Dignano, Vinkuran (another mistake: the Italian name is Vincural). It's very, very strange that you do not have seen that horrors before. I think that you have also to do something for the very incredible and embarassing Dante's citation: come a Pola, presso del Carnaro ch'Italia chiude e i suoi termini bagna. Hope you enjoy my work for you. Best regards.--Luigi 28 (talk) 18:35, 10 June 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Ivo Andrić

Help is needed in this article because of Velebit puppet.--Rjecina (talk) 00:11, 11 June 2008 (UTC)

If you are interested look Wikipedia:Requests for checkuser/Case/J. A. Comment . Here is all evidence that he is puppet of banned user Velebit. If he is not puppet I will be blocked because of my revert ban but you can see that nothing is happening :=--Rjecina (talk) 02:00, 11 June 2008 (UTC)

Problem is solved :)--Rjecina (talk) 02:40, 11 June 2008 (UTC)

Small editorial help is needed in article Timeline of Yugoslavian breakup (my last edits).Thanks--Rjecina (talk) 18:59, 12 June 2008 (UTC)

[edit] History of Dalmatia

OK. But I'm out of time at the moment. Anyway, from the first sight, I've seen one little mistake. You noted Trogir, Split and Dubrovnik as "Byzantine" cities with the largest Croatian influence during Medieval. But you fail to note one that had more of it than all these cities together in those ages. It is Zadar. As you know Croatian state was established in the Zadar surrounding and its inland (Ravni Kotari). All earlier royal Croatian cities were first next to Zadar, Nin just a several km's to the west. First inscription (carved in stone) "Dux Croathorum" was found in Šopot 20 km's to the north-east of Zadar. Croatian names were recorded in Zadar from the beginning of 9th century. During 10th Croats already made a majority of the population of all city classes, no doubt - it was ruled by the Croats then, in real sense of meaning. In 13th and 14th the documents have shown that almost all names recorded were Croatian, unlike any other of these cities, it's city where Dalmatian language vanished the most earliest, because of very early Croatization of all Zadar district. Strong Venetization of Zadar began in 15th century and was more accented than elsewhere (Zadar was a thorn in the eye of Venetians). Even that was not enough to destroy Croatian identity of that city (1st Cro novel in 16th century, usage of angular Glagolithics until 18th). However occasions from 19th and 20th century largely influenced modern perception of Zadar as largely Italianized city, mostly due to fanatic Italian propaganda. I've decided to clean up Zadar history for the months ago, but I still didn't do it. Shame on me. Zenanarh (talk) 11:01, 11 June 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Chetniks

Chetniks in East Bosnia start to collaborate with Germans AFTER Operation Trio --89.172.193.242 (talk) 15:12, 11 June 2008 (UTC)

Look here, here, and here. --89.172.193.242 (talk) 15:30, 11 June 2008 (UTC)

Axis History Factbook: Black Legion (Croatia) Feb-Apr 42: the Legion operated independantly during February and early March, and did not participate again in a large. planned anti-partisan sweep until 15 March, when it took up positions at Han Pijesak to anchor the eastern flank of the German 718. Inf. Division. This operation, called "Trio I", employed the Italian divisions "Taureneese", "Pusteria" and "Sassari", as well as the Croatian 3rd and 4th Frontier Battalions and several battalions from the 8th,13th and 15th Infantry Regiments. The Legion was deployed in the strenght of three battalions and a battery of mountain artillery. "Trio I" was the first operation in which the Legion played a dominant role, in that it was primarly responsible for destroying and dispersing the Major Jezdimir Dangić Chetnik force of 4,500 men which infested the area and were the focal point of the sweep. During the operation, which ran until 24 April, the Legion killed many civilians that willingly or unwillingly gave support to the Chetniks and Partiisans. Villages were quickly and silently surrounded, and then set afire by mortar and artillery fire. Those who tried to escape from the inferno, regardless of their age or sex, were mowed down by concetrated rifle and machine gun fire. At the conclusion of the operation, the Legion was used to mop up pockets of resistance to the north of Foča. --89.172.219.161 (talk) 16:11, 11 June 2008 (UTC)

German-Chetnik relations and Serbian Nazi connection from srpskaistorija (serbian history) Ladislaus Hory und Martin Broszat, "Der Kroatische Ustascha Staat 1941-1945",p.119. refrence to "Bericht des deutschen Kriegsverwaltungscher SS-Gruppenfuehrer Turner vom 16.02.1942 an Himmler: Pers.Stab RFSS, Inst f. Zeitgesch. MA 328, Bl. 6516814ff.

Quote "Bands operating in East Bosnia also involve, appart from Communists, chetnik bands of the former Col. Mihailovic and Major Jezdimir Dangic... Dangic doesn't want to fight the Wehrmacht and according to the Bericht des Bevoellmaechtingen Komandierenden Generals in Serbien written on 5th of February, this was proved on the field... Major Dangic has made following proposals in the negotiations in Belgrade: He is willing to secure Eastern Bosnia with his chetniks under following conditions:

1.) that all Ustasha withdraw from this area; 2.) that the Germans army takes over the area; 3.) that the Croatian administration apparatus be made of Serbs, Croats and Muslims.

Based on the former, negotiations were conducted by Komandierenden General in consultation with German ambassador in Zagreb and with Croatian government. They failed because of the objections of the Croatian government, which would not tolerate such reductions to the state's souverenity; Komandieredende General who would not act without their consent, broke off the talks."

Two months after this negotiations, East Bosnia Chetniks were destroyed by Ustasha Black Legion during the Operation Trio. Major Dangić was captured by Germans and sent into POW camp in Poland. --89.172.219.161 (talk) 18:43, 11 June 2008 (UTC)

What the heck is this??? --PaxEquilibrium (talk) 20:23, 11 June 2008 (UTC)

This is apparent evidence that Chetnik forces did not openly collaborate with the Germans during operation TRIO. --DIREKTOR ^(TALK) 21:03, 11 June 2008 (UTC)

Oh...just saw right now your dispute. --PaxEquilibrium (talk) 21:43, 11 June 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Mother Tongue Italian =

What? Didn't you - a Croat - know that in your Country the census is done also for mother tongue?!?!?!? How old are you, my little friend? Are you just alive in 2001 (last census in Croatia)? Me, an Italian, are teaching to a real Croat his census!!! In-cre-di-ble!!!
So: listen to me.

1. For the Slovenian Census, you can read directly in the link here[9]: Population by mother tongue, municipalities, Slovenia, Census 2002
   
2. For your census: [10] --> released data --> census 2001 --> tables --> population by mother tongue by towns/municipalities --> (scroll down) County of Istria. Voilà! You have your irredentistic source!!! You are really fantastic, my friend!!! Regards from the Adriatic Sea.--Luigi 28 (talk) 21:19, 11 June 2008 (UTC)

Very good Luigi. Why didn't you say so the first time? You see, if your edits are properly sourced, the encyclopedia gets better, and nobody will argue with you. Very useful data for transferring to the Istrian exodus article, too. Excellent work. AlasdairGreen27 (talk) 21:25, 11 June 2008 (UTC)

Don't worry, also you are really fantastic!!!--Luigi 28 (talk) 21:53, 11 June 2008 (UTC)

Watch out Alasdair, lest "justice be done upon thee" (fantastico! rotfl) --DIREKTOR ^(TALK) 22:02, 11 June 2008 (UTC)

LOL, LOL, and LOL! PIO, you really need to consider how your sentences may sound in English... your attempts at insulting me are the highlight of my day (a touch of self-bashing ;). Ponder on this: I'm so much younger than you, and yet I can speak English while you can't :P Don't lose your temper, all I said was that I want you to properly source your information, since the statistics site is HUGE, and I have good reason to doubt your credibility, you being a suspected sock and all... --DIREKTOR ^(TALK) 21:57, 11 June 2008 (UTC)

Yes, yes: the Croatian Irredentistic source was beautiful!!! I'm still laughing! But... maybe... all you need is love...--Luigi 28 (talk) 22:08, 11 June 2008 (UTC)

Thanks, how... Italian of you. Maybe you do too, if I remember correctly, you're supposed to be "married" in this sock. Croatia does not have any "irredentistic" claims on Italy, we already have everything we could possibly want from you guys :P (thank you, Benito!) --DIREKTOR ^(TALK) 22:10, 11 June 2008 (UTC)

You don't understand DIREKTOR, the Croats are guilty because Istria is a part of the Republic of Croatia. --PaxEquilibrium (talk) 22:16, 11 June 2008 (UTC)

? --DIREKTOR ^(TALK) 22:16, 11 June 2008 (UTC)

[11]: irredentistic against yourself!!! Please, stop me! I'm laughing and coughing for my young Croatian friend who has everything and is highly intelligent! That's wonderful!!! Oh boys!--Luigi 28 (talk) 22:17, 11 June 2008 (UTC)

Even though I have many friends in Italy, I dare say you are NOT one of them, my old Italian friend. Um, I did not say Croats are "irredentistic" against ourselves, you misunderstood. --DIREKTOR ^(TALK) 22:18, 11 June 2008 (UTC)

Lmfao. Make it then that it seems that they are guilty because they are born... --PaxEquilibrium (talk) 22:20, 11 June 2008 (UTC)

It was a joke...on Luigi...nm. :) --PaxEquilibrium (talk) 22:22, 11 June 2008 (UTC)

Oh yeah, we should have all contracted the plague so that the romantic Italians would not have to slaughter us in concentration camps. Hey! if only the Jews weren't there as well, there wouldn't have been a holocaust :P
Right, I thought it was old PIO, LOL, didn't see the signature --DIREKTOR ^(TALK) 22:26, 11 June 2008 (UTC)

Pax, pax: you are too wise for me. Please, address your questions to the young and intelligent Ivan. I'm tired and go to bed. Hi, funny patriots.--Luigi 28 (talk) 22:25, 11 June 2008 (UTC)

I just figured it out! This guy thought we were arguing! Just what I need, a rabid nationalist preaching inter-Yugoslav tolerance. --DIREKTOR ^(TALK) 22:32, 11 June 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Favor

Could I perhaps ask you a favor (I suck at such template-editing)...could you perhaps design a babel for myself? --PaxEquilibrium (talk) 21:44, 11 June 2008 (UTC)

Sure, the easiest way would be to copy-paste mine and change the parameters (colors, fonts,...) to something you like, how's that? --DIREKTOR ^(TALK) 22:29, 11 June 2008 (UTC)

woops, PIO was right about one thing: it is getting late. I'm signing off for today, see ya tomorrow. --DIREKTOR ^(TALK) 22:34, 11 June 2008 (UTC)

Nm. As I said, I am far too lazy when it comes to template-editing... :-) --PaxEquilibrium (talk) 16:49, 12 June 2008 (UTC)

You mean 2:0 :) ? --PaxEquilibrium (talk) 17:18, 12 June 2008 (UTC)

!!!!! --PaxEquilibrium (talk) 17:52, 12 June 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Historija naroda Jugoslavije

Historija naroda Jugoslavije, Zagreb, Školska knjiga, 1960, Volume II, group of historians (Vladimir Babić, Vaso Čubrilović, Branislav Đurđev, Nedim Filipović, Ferdo Gastrin, Bogo Grafenauer, Nada Klaić, Ljuben Lape, Arpad Lebl, Mitra Mitrović, Fedor Moačanin, Jorjo Tadić and Fran Zwitter).

A huge and absolutely brilliant book in pdf, but watch out - 400 MBs. Thought you'd probably like it. :) --PaxEquilibrium (talk) 23:12, 11 June 2008 (UTC)