Talk:Diplomatic rank
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
 |
This article is within the scope of WikiProject International relations, an attempt to provide information in a consistent format for articles about international organizations, diplomats, international meetings, and relations between states. If you would like to participate, you can choose to edit the article attached to this page, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. |
| ??? | This article has not yet been assigned a rating on the quality scale. |
| ??? | This article has not yet been assigned a rating on the importance scale. |
Contents |
[edit] Chargé d'Affaires
A Chargé d'Affairs should be differentiated from a Chargé d'Affaires, ad interim. 'Ad interim' would of course denote in the absence of a regular ambassador or other permanent chief of mission.
[edit] Proconsul
What about proconsul? I heard this was a rank somewhere. --Sobolewski 21:00, 2 December 2005 (UTC)
In the Roman Empire; it was administrative, not diplomatic. See the article. J S Ayer 01:43, 6 May 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Meaning of "Extraordinary and Plenipotentiary"?
How did it appear? Is it used now? What does it mean? Can an ambassador be either extraordinary or plenipotentiary only? Samnikal 03:24, 21 January 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Ordering of Sections
Is there any reason that the modern explanation of rank should not be at the top, with the historical ones relegated below? I know many references are to the historical versions, but the article should be about the most current explanation of the term. Sarcasmboy 12:12, 29 June 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Grammar Convention
The United States does. The United States do not do. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 136.167.130.245 (talk) 18:08, 19 November 2007 (UTC)
