Talk:Dino Crisis 3
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Contents |
[edit] POV
The game was widely mocked for its apparent desperation in story design. The game sucks ass. Don't buy or play it."
This is definately POV. I'll remove the last 2 sentences. --84.156.173.147 10:40, 18 April 2006 (UTC)
It wasn't that bad. Well... Put it this way. The camera angles in a more of an old classical 'horror view', where you hardly ever see the monster. I doubt Regina crossing the time gate would end up on the Ozymandais because it was a stable timegate. How about that! Also if you read all the files it shows the drama, like the 'chat logs' where 2 friends talk to each other, in the 3rd one of them dies! how does that make it as you say 'suck ass'. I will also note that saying that can in some circomstances, even end in being sued by the creators. so yo better keep your mouth shut when bad mouthing a companies creation, especialy if its Virgin(company), Capcom, Nintendo, Sony or Microsoft.--Hello 10:10, 20 Febuary 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Reaction
I fixed most of typos in that article but it's still a mess. It definitely needs a re-write.
Also in the Trivia section it mentions that Mikami was the executive producer on Dino Crisis 3 but in the Reaction article it is stated that Mikami had nothing to do with the game. Which is right?--80.186.158.146 22:17, 17 July 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Must be vandalism...
I thought the investigating ship was called the Seyfert, or seyfurt or something like that (ie. 2 cutscenes + e3 trailer), yet this says it's the 'U.S.S. Ark'. Also, i dont remember the ozymandais being a british-american colony ship.--Hello 16:01, 28 Febuary 2007 (UTC)
Caren Ashford! i swear it was sumething like vielopando or sumat. I'm guessing someone is changing them to seem more Residen Evil. Also, it doesn't say she worked in the hanger deck. All the crew roster (which also states what job they've got) doesn't say anything close to that.
[edit] Fair use rationale for Image:Dino Crisis 3 Australis.png
Image:Dino Crisis 3 Australis.png is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.
BetacommandBot 22:23, 29 October 2007 (UTC)

