Talk:Digital audio editor
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
[edit] "Unix-like"
What is the problem with "Unix-like"? Darrien 15:43, 25 Jun 2004 (UTC)
- It's developed for Linux, not for any other platform. That it happens to run on FreeBSD is nice, but that doesn't make it a FreeBSD app any more than being able to run MS Office under WINE makes Office a Linux app.
- Why are you so eager to cleanse mention of Linux even when the app is specifically developed for Linux as per the project web page (e.g. Rosegarden, Asterisk)? I understand and agree with removing gratuitous Linuxisms, but when it's the actual targeted platform, cleansing all mention is just POV-pushing anti-advocacy - David Gerard 15:49, 25 Jun 2004 (UTC)
[edit] Link
Added link to digital audio workstation at start of article, because linked article is very closely related to this article, while at the same time more comprehensive.
- IMO this article is useful to keep separately, since much audio editing is done with since packages on general-use computers vs having a dedicated workstation. I agree that they should be linked though. jwilkinson 16:12, 20 April 2006 (UTC)
[edit] More software
Free audio software has more software that could be added to this list. Λυδαcιτγ 23:27, 12 April 2007 (UTC)
- MixCraft By Acoustica http://www.acoustica.com (approximately $40 w/Trial Period) 23:46, 16 December 2007 (UTC)
- Good call; I did it. Also removed some titles from free audio software which were not, in fact, free software. 66.30.20.71 (talk) 19:15, 19 April 2008 (UTC)

