Talk:Digicel
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
[edit] Digicel written like an advertisment?
I have been updating the Digicel page and have seen it stated as written like an advertisment. I have read over it recently and do not believe this to be the case as only fact is stated. Can anybody see anything that makes this look more of a biased article? I have taken down the advertisement warning as a result however if anyone sees differently please explain why.
--RÓ2000 01:48, 3 August 2007 (UTC)
- I'm the one who originally put the tag up. It looks much better now to me and I agree with removing the tag. There still seems to be a lack of sourcing for a sizable part of the article. Company press releases and websites should be avoided (see WP:RS). Notmyrealname 17:21, 3 August 2007 (UTC)
- Yes i agree that company press releases should be avoided and will look for further sourcing material from independent carribbean, european and american media groups. if i can find any to replace the Digicel releases already sourced on this entry I will.
- -- RÓNÁN "Caint / Talk" 17:09, 21 August 2007 (UTC)

