User talk:Diezba

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Diezba (user • contribs) welcomes you to his talk page and cordially invites you to civil discourse and debate on what is, is not, and might be appropriate on this amazing resource and community we call Wikipedia.

[edit] Christian Sorority Ring

Hey, could you make a Ring for Christian Sororities Alpha Delta Chi, Sigma Alpha Omega, Sigma Phi Lambda, Theta Alpha

[edit] Comments on contributions from the user

[edit] Christian Fraternity

Thanks man for fixing that up, it looks great and the information is very good. We agree one hundred percent with it! Jczupjczup

[edit] Vanderbilt University

Thanks for bulking up the Vandy athletics information!

[edit] Sigma Phi Lambda

Watch the editorializing on the Sigma Phi Lambda page. --Jczup

[edit] Welcome

Welcome to wikipedia and thanks for your mondo edits to Vanderbilt University and specifically the athletics sections. It looks great. --Ttownfeen 04:11, 13 June 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Kappa Upsilon Chi

Who did you talk to since you said you had confirmation from officials at Kappa Upsilon Chi. I called one of the Board of Directors and he instructed me to change the trivia and history back and we would like to correct the person who gave you any form of an unauthorized confirmation.

[edit] Christian Fraternity Category

Can you make a Wiki ring similar to one for IFC or Panhellenic for Christian Greek Organizations? I have no idea how to do that.

Thanks man! Jczup 15:07, 14 June 2006 (UTC)jczup

[edit] New articles

Please don't make a whole bunch of new articles with no actual content in them. If you want to make a list of articles which are needed in your userspace, do that. Write the articles when you have time to actually write them. I'm going to WP:PROD them now, instead of speedying them, however be aware that they may be speedy-deleted. Mak (talk) 03:12, 14 June 2006 (UTC)

Please see WP:STUB. The articles you were creating were not substantial enough even to be called stubs, since they contained absolutely no information specific to the specific article. Stubs are good. Pages with only templates and stub notices in them are not so good. Mak (talk) 20:28, 14 June 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Tennessee spam

See [1] and [2]. -Will Beback 20:22, 16 June 2006 (UTC)

Thanks -- I was just curious

That's quite alright - you shouldn't hesitate to question edits that look odd. Cheers, -Will Beback 21:58, 16 June 2006 (UTC)

[edit] re:AFDs?

You said: I'm curious: if you're not an admin, how do you have authority to delete? —Preceding unsigned comment added by Diezba (talk • contribs)

I don't have the delete privilege assigned to my account. What are you talking about? Alphachimp ^talk 03:17, 18 July 2006 (UTC)

A wikify tag isn't so much a statement that "this page violates policy", as it is a suggestion that the stylistic and title elements of the page need to be fixed. This could also extend to the inclusion of information that is not necessary for wikipedia (e.g. the founders of the frat). Although a talk page mention is suggested in the template, editors rarely use the talk page for the cleanup or wikify tags. I hope that helps. Alphachimp ^talk 03:21, 18 July 2006 (UTC)

Never mind. That definition is different from the one I was using. No worries. It wasn't a condemnation of the article. Alphachimp ^talk 03:23, 18 July 2006 (UTC)

Hello. In case you didn't know, when you add content to talk pages, you should sign your posts by typing four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment. You may also push the signature button located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your name and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when. Thank you!Alphachimp ^talk 03:36, 18 July 2006 (UTC)

[edit] wiki-marxists

This is a request for immediate help from Kmaguir1 07:47, 30 August 2006 (UTC). If you have time, I'd like you to examine the Bell Hooks article and talk page. It's a scholarly article about a controversial writer, someone who drew the ire of a conservative commentator. They wanted me to go get the quote from her book, and I did that. But now, they're arguing it's not notable. As a follower of Wikipedia, you will know that of all the meaningless academic trivia included on her page, that what they wanted to exclude was really ridiculous: that she says as an opening to her book, Killing Rage, "I am writing this essay sitting beside an anonymous white male that I long to murder". This may in itself be notable, but David Horowitz wrote about it in 100 Dangerous Professors, and it was written about on front page mag, and all the citations are given on the page. I would appreciate your help--I'm contending with some very difficult Marxists who are attached to her work, and think that they're defending the liberal cause, but really, they're just keeping out material that is very easily notable.-Kmaguir1 07:47, 30 August 2006 (UTC)

Greetings. In the interest of disclosure, I'd like to inform you of a conduct RfC on Kmaguir1. It's here: Wikipedia:Requests_for_comment/Kmaguir1. If you have time and are so inclined, feel free to provide comments there. Meanwhile, if you go to the bell hooks page, please do join in the discussion. If you read the Talk page and look at my and others' edit histories, you'll see that the picture is not quite as Kmaguir1 paints it. (I have no idea who the Marxists are he's referring to, and I've also edited his text for improvement, and left it in the article, vs. what he's saying here.)

Bottom line: welcome to bell hooks, be aware of the RfC, and feel free to join it. Cheers,--Anthony Krupp 17:26, 30 August 2006 (UTC)

[edit] VU athletics

I noticed that you've removed the {{citeneeded}} tags from the Vanderbilt University article and replaced them with a link to vucommodores.com. I'm going to edit those where possible to replace them with links to actual websites. It would be helpful if, in the future, you could cite the actual articles, rather than just "Commodore History Corner" from vucommodores.com. None of the Commodore History Corner articles I read contained a reference to W. L. Granbery, for example. Esrever 02:57, 17 January 2007 (UTC)

[edit] WAY-FM

I realize it's been over 6 months, but I was wondering if you could explain this split: [3]. Both articles seem to imply that these two articles are on separate subjects, but the larger one lists the stations in the smaller one as belonging to them. Long story short: what is the difference, if any? Thanks! JPG-GR 07:47, 20 January 2007 (UTC)

There are two WAY-FMs -- one is a national, Christian radio network; the other is a local station that has no affiliation with the national network but uses a similar "handle," or station identifier.

[edit] Copyright problems with Image:Samford University Hanna Arena.jpg

Dystopos 19:30, 15 March 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Christian Fraternity ring

I noticed you posted on Jzcup's talk page about a christian fraternity ring. What gives? KEYLAY31^hablame 06:48, 12 April 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Image:Jason_Hoyt.jpg listed for deletion

An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, Image:Jason_Hoyt.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Images and media for deletion. Please look there to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. BigrTex 20:40, 26 April 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Image:Jay_Cutler.jpg listed for deletion

An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, Image:Jay_Cutler.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Images and media for deletion. Please look there to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. BigrTex 20:40, 26 April 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Image:Samford_University_Step_Sing_2005.jpg listed for deletion

An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, Image:Samford_University_Step_Sing_2005.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Images and media for deletion. Please look there to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. BigrTex 20:50, 26 April 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Christian Fraternity

I left some comments on the Christian fraternity discussion page, thought I'd let you know to get your thoughts. Keylay31^hablame 20:01, 4 May 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Orphaned non-free image (Image:Vanderbilt University Seal.jpg)

Thanks for uploading Image:Vanderbilt University Seal.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BetacommandBot 17:20, 28 May 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Orphaned non-free image (Image:Anglican Communion Network.jpg)

Thanks for uploading Image:Anglican Communion Network.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BetacommandBot 18:18, 28 May 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Beta Upsilon Chi

The KXY editor you speak of has stuck up another conversation about KXY and BXY origins. I invite you to my talk page to take part in this conversation. Keylay 03:19, 10 June 2007 (UTC)

Would appreciate your input at http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:Beta_Upsilon_Chi#KYX_-_Inspiration_for_New_Fraternities. Thanks. Keylay 06:13, 27 June 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Fair use rationale for Image:Baptist_Hymnal.jpg

Thanks for uploading or contributing to Image:Baptist_Hymnal.jpg. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in Wikipedia articles constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use. Suggestions on how to do so can be found here.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. BigrTex 19:20, 29 June 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Image:Samford_University_seal.gif

I have tagged Image:Samford_University_seal.gif as {{no rationale}}, because it does not provide a fair use rationale. If you believe the image to be acceptable for fair use according to Wikipedia policy, please provide a rationale explaining as much, in accordance with the fair use rationale guideline, on the image description page. Please also consider using {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair_use. Thank you. BigrTex 19:20, 29 June 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Image:Samford_Bulldogs.gif

I have tagged Image:Samford_Bulldogs.gif as {{no rationale}}, because it does not provide a fair use rationale. If you believe the image to be acceptable for fair use according to Wikipedia policy, please provide a rationale explaining as much, in accordance with the fair use rationale guideline, on the image description page. Please also consider using {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair_use. Thank you. BigrTex 19:20, 29 June 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Image:Samford_Crimson.jpg

I have tagged Image:Samford_Crimson.jpg as {{no rationale}}, because it does not provide a fair use rationale. If you believe the image to be acceptable for fair use according to Wikipedia policy, please provide a rationale explaining as much, in accordance with the fair use rationale guideline, on the image description page. Please also consider using {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair_use. Thank you. BigrTex 19:20, 29 June 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Image:MOG_Crest.jpg

I have tagged Image:MOG_Crest.jpg as {{no rationale}}, because it does not provide a fair use rationale. If you believe the image to be acceptable for fair use according to Wikipedia policy, please provide a rationale explaining as much, in accordance with the fair use rationale guideline, on the image description page. Please also consider using {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair_use. Thank you. BigrTex 19:21, 29 June 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Image:Alpha_Nu_Omega_Crest.gif

I have tagged Image:Alpha_Nu_Omega_Crest.gif as {{no rationale}}, because it does not provide a fair use rationale. If you believe the image to be acceptable for fair use according to Wikipedia policy, please provide a rationale explaining as much, in accordance with the fair use rationale guideline, on the image description page. Please also consider using {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair_use. Thank you. BigrTex 19:21, 29 June 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Image:AIO_Logo.jpg

I have tagged Image:AIO_Logo.jpg as {{no rationale}}, because it does not provide a fair use rationale. If you believe the image to be acceptable for fair use according to Wikipedia policy, please provide a rationale explaining as much, in accordance with the fair use rationale guideline, on the image description page. Please also consider using {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair_use. Thank you. BigrTex 19:21, 29 June 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Image:Chi_Alpha_Omega_Crest.gif

I have tagged Image:Chi_Alpha_Omega_Crest.gif as {{no rationale}}, because it does not provide a fair use rationale. If you believe the image to be acceptable for fair use according to Wikipedia policy, please provide a rationale explaining as much, in accordance with the fair use rationale guideline, on the image description page. Please also consider using {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair_use. Thank you. BigrTex 19:21, 29 June 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Image:Gamma_Phi_Delta_Crest.jpg

I have tagged Image:Gamma_Phi_Delta_Crest.jpg as {{no rationale}}, because it does not provide a fair use rationale. If you believe the image to be acceptable for fair use according to Wikipedia policy, please provide a rationale explaining as much, in accordance with the fair use rationale guideline, on the image description page. Please also consider using {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair_use. Thank you. BigrTex 19:21, 29 June 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Image:Centrifuge_Logo.jpg

I have tagged Image:Centrifuge_Logo.jpg as {{no rationale}}, because it does not provide a fair use rationale. If you believe the image to be acceptable for fair use according to Wikipedia policy, please provide a rationale explaining as much, in accordance with the fair use rationale guideline, on the image description page. Please also consider using {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair_use. Thank you. BigrTex 19:22, 29 June 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Orphaned non-free image (Image:Samford Bulldogs.gif)

Thanks for uploading Image:Samford Bulldogs.gif. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. fuzzy510 19:53, 6 July 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Fair use rationale for Image:Samford Hall Dedication 1955.jpg

Thanks for uploading or contributing to Image:Samford Hall Dedication 1955.jpg. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in Wikipedia articles constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use. Suggestions on how to do so can be found here.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. After Midnight ⁰⁰⁰¹ 21:50, 14 July 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Beta Upsilon Chi

Hey man, Just met with Jason Hoyt and mentioned the article, and he mentioned your name. Thought I'd say hi. *wave* Keylay 23:35, 12 September 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Template work

Diezba, I see that you made the Christian fraternity template; perhaps you would consider making a similar one for Christian sororities. Information could be found at Christian sorority and Category:Christian sororities. —ScouterSig 02:48, 15 October 2007 (UTC)

[edit] List of mayors of Rogersville, Tennessee

A proposed deletion template has been added to the article List of mayors of Rogersville, Tennessee, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page. Also, please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. If you agree with the deletion of the article, and you are the only person who has made substantial edits to the page, please add {{db-author}} to the top of List of mayors of Rogersville, Tennessee. -- Huntster ^{T • @ • C} 06:52, 16 December 2007 (UTC)

I went and made changes that should satisfy the issues raised by the proposal for deletion of the List of mayors of Rogersville, Tennessee. I have outlined the reasons for why I believe the article is relevant on the discussion page of that article. Diezba (talk) 04:37, 21 December 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Rogersville images

Greetings Diezba, nice work on documenting Rogersville, but I would like to bring two issues to your attention.

1. It appears you only place references by themselves at the bottom of the page; it is strongly preferred that editors use the <ref></ref> system of referencing, so that readers can discover exactly what material came from what source, and so other editors can determine what material was added without any reference (perhaps by editors who come after you). I would encourage you to go back and create this setup, and if you need help in doing this, just let me know and I'll work with you to fix it up.
2. All of the images you are uploading are licensed as free use in one way or another. That is fantastic, except I must question whether the Chamber of Commerce is legally able to declare some of these images as such. Most recently, I see Image:PressmensHome.gif, which says that it was both a postcard (theoretically a commercial object) and that it is from 1925. Declaring the image as public domain requires that it meet certain criteria, and it appears that currently, only works from before 1923 may be declared public domain, though it may be something that needs to be checked on. Alternatively, if the postcard was produced for sale by the city/county, then yes, the current copyright holder could declare it public domain, thus releasing all rights. If, though, someone was hired by the city/county to take the photograph, a whole other set of copyright laws come into effect. Basically, it is messy. I'm not saying that anything is being done incorrectly, just that great care must be taken when it comes to copyright issues. Wikipedia definitely wants to avoid any legal issues that may arise due to improper licensing.

Cheers! -- Huntster ^{T • @ • C} 04:14, 20 December 2007 (UTC)

The Chamber of Commerce, of which my mom is the director (hence my familiarity with the material and the abundance of resources available to me with which to write), has the copyright to all the images that I have indicated; the Chamber, through its agent, has authorized the use of those images on Wikipedia for the purpose of (1) documenting Rogersville and its associated history; and (2) promoting and perpetuating the study of Rogersville and its history. The Pressmen's Home postcard was originally created by the Pressmen's Union; there were a limited run of the postcards; these were then given to the Chamber of Commerce, along with the rights thereto, once the Pressmen's Union abandoned Pressmen's Home (see the Pressmen's Home article for more information on the situation). Thus, the Chamber has the rights to the post card and its associated imagery (not to mention the fact that the photographer is dead, the Union is no longer extant, and the Chamber is the only one with the remaining postcards). Diezba (talk) 04:41, 21 December 2007 (UTC)

That's great to hear. So long as all the bases are covered, everything should be fine :) Thanks for your work in documenting these things. (Though I still hold concerns for point number 1 above!) -- Huntster ^{T • @ • C} 20:05, 22 December 2007 (UTC)

[edit] DYK

On 21 December 2007, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Joseph Rogers, which you created or substantially expanded. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.

--Royalbroil 06:22, 21 December 2007 (UTC)

What an honor, to be on Wikipedia's front page! Diezba (talk) 09:17, 21 December 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Knoxville Gazette.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Knoxville Gazette.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 21:38, 2 January 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Rogersville Review.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Rogersville Review.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 06:33, 21 January 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Disputed fair use rationale for Image:LifeWay Christian Resources Campus.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:LifeWay Christian Resources Campus.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 22:53, 13 February 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Christian Fraternity Template

Hey could you check out this page? [[4]] Keylay

[edit] Jim Sells

Another editor has added the {{prod}} template to the article Jim Sells, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but the editor doesn't believe it satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and has explained why in the article (see also Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not and Wikipedia:Notability). Please either work to improve the article if the topic is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia or discuss the relevant issues at its talk page. If you remove the {{prod}} template, the article will not be deleted, but note that it may still be sent to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. BJBot (talk) 05:59, 5 April 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Clyde Willis (mayor of Rogersville)

Another editor has added the {{prod}} template to the article Clyde Willis (mayor of Rogersville), suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but the editor doesn't believe it satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and has explained why in the article (see also Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not and Wikipedia:Notability). Please either work to improve the article if the topic is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia or discuss the relevant issues at its talk page. If you remove the {{prod}} template, the article will not be deleted, but note that it may still be sent to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. BJBot (talk) 06:00, 5 April 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Fair use rationale for Image:BYX Crest.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:BYX Crest.jpg. You've indicated that the image meets Wikipedia's criteria for non-free content, but there is no explanation of why it meets those criteria. Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. If you have any questions, please post them at Wikipedia:Media copyright questions.

Thank you for your cooperation. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. STBotI (talk) 17:25, 21 May 2008 (UTC)