User talk:DerGlizerndeDiamant

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Contents

[edit] Citations

Well, you can always use the Cite book template, which you can use by adding {{cite book}} on the article. There's more instructions on the template's page itself. Titoxd(?!?) 02:13, 14 June 2006 (UTC)

Blah blah blach[1]is said blah.


[edit] References

  1. ^ Miller, E: "The Sun.", page 23. Academic Press, 2005

[edit] Ralston Hall

Hi! I am one of the other editors of Ralston Hall, and I have noticed that you have taken off the mansion category a number of times. I don't know if you have noticed, but I put a section on the discussion page of the article for us (or whoever) to discuss that. Since it calls itself a mansion, and is a mansion according to the mansion article, I thought the category was appropriate. But I see that house styles is one of your interests/projects here on wikipedia, so I might be missing something. If you believe that the mansion category does not apply to Ralston Hall, I would be more than happy to hear what you have to say and come to a decision. It is just that without a reason or discussion, you cannot keep taking it off. Oh, I just read one of your comments above, and see that you are considering nominating the category for deletion. I think it might cause less confusion if you continue with the nomination, and then if it passes, I think the category will be removed from all the articles (or it can then be removed without question). This will make much more sense to other editors, and then they won't keep coming to you! Either way, let's discuss it. I hope this makes sense, and that you understand that I am just trying to keep the discussion open, instead of just continuing to put it on and take it off over and over. Please let's discuss this at Talk: Ralston Hall. Thanks! DerGlizerndeDiamant 18:39, 29 August 2006 (UTC)

Category:Mansions has been deleted now. I nominated it and there was a large majority if favour. "Mansion" is too subjective to be a good category name. Olborne 18:55, 31 August 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Editing Concerns

  1. Thank you for experimenting with Wikipedia. Your test worked, and it has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you may want to do. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia. Please do not edit others' user pages. Kukini 20:29, 1 December 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Spam in Eve of Milady

Hello, this is a message from an automated bot. A tag has been placed on Eve of Milady, by SkierRMH (talk ยท contribs), another Wikipedia user, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. The tag claims that it should be speedily deleted because Eve of Milady is blatant advertising for a company, product, group, service or person that would require a substantial rewrite in order to become an encyclopedia article.

To contest the tagging and request that administrators wait before possibly deleting Eve of Milady, please affix the template {{hangon}} to the page, and put a note on its talk page. If the article has already been deleted, see the advice and instructions at WP:WMD. Please note, this bot is only informing you of the nomination for speedy deletion, it did not nominate Eve of Milady itself. Feel free to leave a message on the bot operator's talk page if you have any questions about this or any problems with this bot. --Android Mouse Bot 2 05:23, 27 June 2007 (UTC)

[edit] League Table Rankings

View Across St. Salvator's Quadrangle
View Across St. Salvator's Quadrangle
UK
2008
Times Good University Guide 5th[1]
Guardian University Guide 4th[2]
Sunday Times University Guide 6th[3]
Daily Telegraph 5th[4]
PUSH Independent Guide 5th[5]

[edit] League Table Rankings

UK
2008
Times Higher Education Supplement 23rd[6]
Guardian University Guide 7th[2]
Times Good University Guide 13th[3]
Academic Ranking of World Universities 6th[4]
Newsweek 6th[5]