Talk:Delhi

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Featured article star Delhi is a featured article; it (or a previous version of it) has been identified as one of the best articles produced by the Wikipedia community. Even so, if you can update or improve it, please do.
This article has been reviewed by the Version 1.0 Editorial Team.
Version 0.5
 This article has been selected for Version 0.5 and subsequent release versions of Wikipedia.
To-do list for Delhi: edit · history · watch · refresh
  • Summarise History, with link to daughter article.
  • Expand the history of Delhi for the period 1800 to 1947
  • See also—"Delhi related topics" template.
  • Make all red links blue, especially ones on MCD and NDMC.
  • Climate—average figures.
  • Add verifiable figures for the percentage of Hindus, Muslims, Sikhs and Christians in Delhi
  • Urban structure—summarise.
  • Expand—Utility services, Culture, Media.
  • Remove—Tourism, Entertainment. To be incorporated into other sections.
  • Demographics—slum population, poverty, riots. Check figures.
  • Remove all list materials.
  • Inline citations (conspicuously lacking)—preferably using "cite web", "cite news" etc.
  • References (conspicuously lacking)—preferably using "Harvard reference style".
  • Continue improving all sections, many of which are non-comprehensive.
  • Copyedit.
  • Peer review.
  • Add more images.
  • Mention suburbs, bustling suburbs appear nowhere in the article.
  • Sister cities. There is no mention of Delhi's sister cities.
  • Create sub categories of different sections.
  • Correct the map - it is currently a map of Gujarat
Priority 1 (top) 
Archive
Archives
1


Contents

[edit] Image:NDMC1.jpg

Hello! Hey help me i uploaded this photo of ndmc building in CP which is tallest in delhi.i took this shot from my own camera so no copyrights.So,please add this photo to the economy headline with the description i had given above.

[edit] Request from "Prasun"

There is a great website on food in delhi. It has the menu of all the restaurants with their ratings and phone nos. But the problem is that its my start up. I tried putting it up before on wekipedia but somebody removed the link and hence its my request if anyone here can go to my website and check it and then post it here if he or she likes it. foodiebay

i know it will be unfair to spam the wiki and it being my website i am definitely biased towards thinking it as a nice one. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 220.227.156.7 (talk) 21:50, 7 April 2008 (UTC)

[edit] FA

Ummm... with Mumbai, Chennai, Bangalore and soon to be Kolkata featured metros, should Delhi be left behind? Need someone to take the lead. =Nichalp «Talk»= 09:18, 24 April 2006 (UTC)

Just give me a week. My exams get over within a week and then I can start working on this article. --Incman|वार्ता 15:42, 24 April 2006 (UTC)
Have no fear, Incman's here! =Nichalp «Talk»= 17:37, 24 April 2006 (UTC)
Yep! Then we shall have a Featured Topic! That will be great.--Dwaipayanc 20:06, 26 April 2006 (UTC)

[edit] New Delhi

If Delhi is to be made a featured article, New Delhi can be pushed too. One would just need to leverge content from Delhi to New Delhi and make it more specific. New Delhi basically needs expansion on

  • History after 1912
  • Municipal setup
  • Geography and layout

It would be one of the easiest Indian FAs to author. =Nichalp «Talk»= 18:29, 29 April 2006 (UTC)

What do you think should be tried? Delhi or New Delhi? Is New Delhi a separate city? What is basically the city and the metropolitan areas (is there any distinction, like Mumbai and Kolkata)?--Dwaipayan (talk) 18:56, 29 April 2006 (UTC)
I agree with Nichalp that once Delhi is complete, we can start pushing New Delhi. We just have ot be sure that we have enough statistics on New Delhi separately and we are able to establish its identity from Delhi. As Delhi is likely to be the Collaboration of the Week article as well as its more comprehensive currently, we should finish it first. As far as the question of Featured Topic is concerned, the Delhi article says its the metropolis and New Delhi says its a part of metropolis. But [1] says that New Delhi is the metropolis. We should clear this doubt first before trying to push for a "Metros of India" Featured Topic. BTW, all articles are not necessary to be featured to be selected as part of Featured Topic. -Ambuj Saxena (talk) 05:30, 30 April 2006 (UTC)
Delhi should be done first. Content from Delhi will be leveraged to New Delhi. It should not take more than two days to write a FA for New Delhi. As far as the the disambig between Delhi and New Delhi goes: Manorama Yearbook 2003 states that: the NCT consists of the census towns of New Delhi, Delhi and Delhi Cantonment, along with 214 villages. Our main worry now is to decide on the territorial boundaries of the article. (PS Ambuj: that author of the Rediff article is ignorant on the diffence between Delhi and New Delhi). This is New Delhi. It's an urban district. I'm being optimistic, but we can get NCT featured too! =Nichalp «Talk»= 06:31, 30 April 2006 (UTC)
So what's the decision as of now? National Capital Region (India) is the Delhi's metropolitan area of Delhi. NCR is again almost same as NCT. So, I think "Delhi" encompasses nearly everything. However, there will be some problems. For example, population, area data etc. Please decide how to approach. I think, as the article claims, the article Delhi is regarding the metropolis of Delhi (which is NCR, that is almost same as NCT!!). So we should go for Delhi first, then re-use material for New Delhi later, and also, NCT, if necessary. Regards. --Dwaipayan (talk) 06:44, 30 April 2006 (UTC)
The most neutral would be to limit the scope to the area as governed by the Delhi Municipal Corporation. =Nichalp «Talk»= 18:37, 30 April 2006 (UTC)
Well.. mixing up Delhi with the National Capital Territory of Delhi makes sense. But I think there is a clear distinction between Delhi and NCR. NCR includes Gurgaon, NOIDA, Faridabad and Ghaziabad which lie outside NCT. The combined population of these satellite cities is a million plus. So NCR is not the same as NCT. In my opinion, this article should talk about the National Capital Territory of Delhi and not of the Delhi metropolitan area (aka NCR). New Delhi, on the other hand, is just an urban area within the NCT. Similar to Worli or Juhu in Mumbai. We can also take help from articles on Washington D.C. and Canberra, as these regions are similar to Delhi (or NCT) in administrative setup. Cheers --Incman|वार्ता 20:56, 2 May 2006 (UTC)

Confusing: Somebody please fix up the discussion in this article of New Delhi. It is not at all clear. Compare this to the opening statement in the "New Delhi" article: that statement is simple and clear. Kdammers 02:11, 30 August 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Collaboration

OK, now that its Indian Collaboration of the Week, it's our chance to raise this article to FA status. It's obvious (I think) that we should focus our efforts on making this article better the standard set by Kolkata. That raises some simply points:

  • The lead-in is too long, needs compressing a bit.
  • Creation of History of Delhi and compressing of history section.
  • Prosify geography section so that there is generally more info and less dot points.
  • Expansion in all of the remaining sections.
  • CITATION, heavily required considering all the {{Fact}} tags lying around.

I might not be able to help for the next 2/3 days, but I'll be there in the last few days of collaboration. Nobleeagle (Talk) 07:49, 30 April 2006 (UTC)

Oh, just read the To-do list, missed it somehow. Anyway, the points mentioned above apart form expansion should be first priority. It's better to first perfect what we have, before adding other things that may end up having their own issues. Nobleeagle (Talk) 07:50, 30 April 2006 (UTC)
However, I think we better expand Culture, Utility services etc. We have to remove tourism, Entertainment etc anyway (those do not conform to the Wikiproject Indian Cities). Materials from these sections may be incorporated elsewhere.--Dwaipayan (talk) 08:07, 30 April 2006 (UTC)

[edit] History of Delhi

History of Indian indepence movement, history during 1950-1980s, and 1990s missing. 700-1500 may be slightly decreased.--Dwaipayan (talk) 11:33, 30 April 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Lead image

I dont think the lotus house image is the image I would use as the lead image. Maybe something like red fort or india gate image would be a better candidate. Also keep in mind that their are too many images in the article right now and some will have to be dropped (Ganga plain image is rather boring). --Blacksun 14:07, 30 April 2006 (UTC)

What do you mean by boring? In my opinion, encyclopedic articles are not meant for entertainment only. They should be informative too. The image gives a visual description of Delhi and its surrounding areas' geography. I am sorry, but I was not able to find a better image for the geography section. Generally, an image depicting the skyline of the downtown area is used as the lead image. --Incman|वार्ता 21:08, 2 May 2006 (UTC)
By boring I mean it lacks in information value. --Blacksun 13:03, 3 January 2007 (UTC)

i would liike to t —Preceding unsigned comment added by 125.19.4.18 (talk) 08:29, 17 September 2007 (UTC)

[edit] FA status

Well, I think the article is prepared for a Peer Review. Any suggestions?? --Incman|वार्ता 22:27, 15 May 2006 (UTC)

Can you give a citation for the origin of the name? ramit 07:40, 16 May 2006 (UTC)
I tried my best finding an appropriate citation but couldn't. I think the user who wrote this section might help us out. Is there any other concern you have with the article? --Incman|वार्ता 01:39, 17 May 2006 (UTC)

Ok, trying to give my views where applicable:

  • Are you sure of three municipal corporations. delhigovt.nic.in lists only 2: MCD/ NDMC. There are three indeed: http://delhigovt.nic.in/muniserv.asp
  • sixth most populous appears twice in the same para
  • Not sure of the grammar of "Delhi registers as one of the fastest growing cities in Asia"
  • It would be good to cite a source for "Archaeological evidence suggests that Indraprastha once stood where the Old Fort is today"
  • Maybe related to above point: history section mentions that Purana Qila was built by Shershah Suri but culture section mentions it as a 5th century BC fortress
  • "Every year, the heat wave in summer claims several lives in Delhi" - does this need a source? A cursory search on Google didnt give me any numbers.
  • "most visited Vaishnavite temple in the world, Birla Mandir". I would have thought it was Vaishno Devi...
  • "Prime Minister of India addresses the nation on Delhi Fort" - is Red fort also known as Delhi fort?
  • "lit traditional lamps" - should this be light traditional lamps?
  • Shopping section needs to be more wikified?
  • Transport - Should Ring Road Be changed to Mahatma Gandhi Road?
  • "million in middle schools, while 1.31 million students were enrolled in secondary schools" - Arent middle and secondary schools the same?
  • " New Delhi Television (NDTV) is among the largest television media networks in India" - Needs citation?
  • "Hindustan Times, with over a million copies in circulation, is the single largest English daily in Delhi." TOI claims it is the largest.
  • "Hindi-daily Dainik Bhaskar is by far the most popular newspaper" - needs citation
  • "A major reason for the popularity of print media in Delhi is the lack of electronic media" - Not sure about this statement. Which electronic media does Delhi lack?
  • Utlities: Power theft needs a mention?
  • "Delhi government invested 149.2 billion INR in the city's energy sector" - needs citation?
  • External links need to be debated. e.g. Should Akshardham temple be there? Yellow pages: can we have better ones such as Infomedia or Just Dial etc.
  • Should we move this conversation to the Indian cities project page, so that we could get more feedback? ramit 09:16, 17 May 2006 (UTC)
Thanks for the review and copyedit.
  • The metropolis of Delhi (aka NCT) is the sixth most populous metropolis in the world while the agglomeration of Delhi (aka NCR) is the sixth most populous agglomeration in the world. It is a matter of coincidence.
  • I don't see anything wrong in the grammar. However, it is not a very well phrased sentence. Will make changes to it.
  • Don't know much about Delhi's history. Will work on it.
  • Contradictory. Hmm..
  • Presisely. Since I couldn't get any numbers, had to write many people are killed due to heat waves. Included an article as a source which says people are killed due to heat wave in northern India which includes Delhi. Hope that works.
  • Vaishno Devi is more to do with Shaktism. Birla Mandir is devoted to Lord Vishnu while Vaishno Devi is devoted to Goddess Durga.
  • See Red Fort. The one in Agra (which apparently is more popular) is known as Red Fort too. So to avoid confusion, the one in Delhi is referred to as Delhi Fort.
  • I think lit lamps is correct. However, light lamps sounds correct too. Anything is fine with me.
  • Will work on it. The last couple of sentences are messed up.
  • No. Ring Road is a more popular name than MG Road. Besides, the economic survey of Delhi calls it Ring Road.
  • The economic survey of Delhi classifies schools in Delhi into three categories, primary, middle and secondary. Lets stick to offical classifications.
  • Done.
  • Well I need a source for that. Its a matter of dispute. HT claims to be the largest on its official site. TOI made such a claim couple of years ago but after the dispute, it has refrained from making such claims.
  • Will work on it.
  • Its not that Delhi lacks electronic media, but its a well proven fact that relatively print media is more popular than electronic media in Delhi. A reason why newspapers and magazines are still so popular in Delhi.
  • Good point. Will work on it.
  • See the source given before. Every data in that para is taken from Economic Survey of Delhi.
  • External links, See also and Categories need some work. Will remove Akshardham as an external link.


Thanks for the feedback. If you are not satisfied with my replies, then you may take your queries to Indian cities project page to get more feedback. Cheers :) --Incman|वार्ता 18:58, 17 May 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Merge with Delhi

There is absolutely no reason to have two seperate articles on Delhi and National Capital Territory of Delhi. Delhi was first a union territory in India and later on after the commencement of the 69th amendment to the Indian constitution, Delhi was given a status of a National Capital Territory. As one can notice, most of the content of the National Capital Territory of Delhi is similar to that of the Delhi article. --Deepak|वार्ता 05:14, 6 December 2005 (UTC)

Good point. Following the examples set by other federal capital cities, there seems to be some variation as to whether the city is treated as the same as the subnational entity where it is situated and whether one article is redirected to the other. For example, Washington is indistinguishable from the District of Columbia (the city, though not the entire conurbation) and so here in Wikipedia they both share the same entry. The same goes for Buenos Aires and Kuala Lumpur (no separate entry for the district, because its limits are coterminous with those of the city). The following federal capital cities which are physically and administratively not identical to their respective federal capital districts or territories, have their own entries in WP:
--Big Adamsky 14:04, 6 December 2005 (UTC)
The city of Delhi as such lies entirely in Delhi and what lies outside are regarded as satellite towns; not a part of the city of Delhi. There is a clear line between the metropolis of Delhi which lies within the NCT and the agglomeration of Delhi which lies in three states. Besides, according to the economic survey of Delhi, only 10% of Delhi's pop is rural. This means that the city of Delhi covers most part of the NCT. Hence, both the NCT and the metropolis of Delhi deserve the same article. --Incman|वार्ता 05:37, 16 May 2006 (UTC)
I agree with Deepak. NCT could just exist as a category and not as an article. ramit 07:37, 16 May 2006 (UTC)

Some quick points:

  1. NCT is not a state. It is a unique administrative area jointly administered by the Union and NCT government.
  2. The metropolis of Delhi lies entirely in NCT. What lies outside NCT are known as satellite towns of Delhi. Please see the difference between a metropolis and agglomeration.
  3. According to the Economic survey of Delhi, 90% of NCT's population is urban (i.e. 90% of the population lives in the city of Delhi).
  4. The 69th ammendment to the Indian constituion says that Delhi's official name now is National Capital Territory of Delhi. The name Delhi itself signifies the NCT. There is no other meaning, officially and practically, of Delhi. So Delhi is nothing but the NCT (same as the case with Washington D.C. and District of Columbia). The articles on both NCT and Delhi will have to merged. As one can clearly notice, most of the content in the National Capital Territory of Delhi article is the same as the Delhi article. --Incman|वार्ता 18:22, 17 May 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Failed GA

This article failed to become a good article as there are no references stated. Cheung1303 03:16, 22 May 2006 (UTC)

I think you missed the "References" section. Need a pair of eyeglasses? --61.246.75.39 19:42, 3 June 2006 (UTC)

I will add, this article failed on the account of the merger. Till this is resolved please renominate. Lincher 15:21, 10 June 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Map of India is wrong....

Please make sure that Arunachal Pradesh is shown as a state of India which it is. It is as stupid as showing California as disputed terrotory with Mexico...:).

Delhi is a state and not a Union Territory. Pls make the correction

The Constitution of India regards Delhi as a special Union Territory. It is not a state. --Incman|वार्ता 14:50, 23 August 2006 (UTC)

Delhi was a union territory. But now it is a state

Delhi is neither a state nor a union territory. It has a status which lies in between with both the central and the delhi govt sharing responsibility of governance (differently then in other states). For example the Delhi Police is under the central government and schools are under the delhi government. See http://mha.nic.in/acts-rules/Govt_of_NCT_Act1991.pdf

Shahab 18:07, 14 February 2007 (UTC)

[edit] External links

Hi, I had put the link to Delhilive.com in the external links categories which was removed from the page. I beleive I added the link in the right category of the site consifering the fact that the site encoruages people to contribute and share information. Please let me know if someone thinks otherwise and why? —Preceding unsigned comment added by Manuj 78 (talk • contribs)

Hi, please go through Wikipedia:External Links. We only link to sites that add value to the article in question. Other external links are generally discouraged -- Lost (talk) 13:29, 14 September 2006 (UTC)
The objective of wikipedia article on delhi is to provide a summarised, unbiased view for Delhi mostly for people interested in travelling to it. Whereas the objective of my site is to cover daily issues of delhi in a constructive way encouraging discussion. That is why the site has sections for history, culture as well as sections for upcoming events, news as well as having a comic strip on the front page of the site which takes a comic view of the issues affecting delhiites. Wikiepdia on the other hand is an international portal which has guidelines in place for providing an unbiased view. my site on the other hand aims to give delhiites the ability to express their view democratically, without caring for being unbiased. For all these above reasons I believe that link for delhilive.com should be included in the external links category for Wike Delhi and New Delhi
I generally don't think it's wise to include links to commercial sites unless they are referenced in the article or provide relevant information that for some reason cannot be summarized in the article. There would be so many companies wanting free advertising from Wikipedia. There are search engines for people looking for sites dealing with Delhi. An encyclopedia should not be serving as a web directory. -- Dieresis 13:37, 16 September 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Lead

Please consider moving all the alternate information in the lead (different languages and scripts etc) and put them in the infobox instead.--Filll 17:34, 22 January 2007 (UTC)

[edit] MAP IS SCREWD

Theres something wrong with the map. Delhi is not located in Sri Lanka! — The preceding unsigned comment was added by Nikkul (talk • contribs) 19:47, 14 February 2007 (UTC).

It appears fine to me. Probably an issue with your browser — Lost (talk) 06:42, 15 February 2007 (UTC)
It's been fixed now.--Dwaipayan (talk) 06:44, 15 February 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Beijing Beautiful...Delhi---dull

I was looking at the Beijing page and i noticed that each section has pics of Beijing booming. New buildings and glamor...Not that Delhi should be compared with Bejing, but can we add pics that makes Delhi look a little more high-tech?

For example, under people and culture, can someone submit a pic of the local mall? (I live in the US so I can't really do that)

And a better pic of the government building and some better pics under the economy section? Lets make Delhi shine!

Dude! As Nichalp will argue, Beijing is not even 'Good' article. Why to show only one aspect of Delhi? Encyclopedia should present neutral information as much as possible. spacejuncky 05:18, 15 February 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Big mistake

In 1984, the assassination of Indira Gandhi (Prime Minister of India)... Gandhi died in January 30, 1948 and not in 1984... Bobsodium from wikipedia France 202.53.15.226 06:07, 13 March 2007 (UTC)

Mahatma Gandhi died in 1948. Indira Gandhi is another peron, who was Prime Minister of India and was assassinated in 1984. Regards.--Dwaipayan (talk) 06:33, 13 March 2007 (UTC)
Shame on me, I'm sorry...Bobsodium202.53.15.226 07:32, 13 March 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Population figures

Delhi [...] is the second-largest metropolis in India after Mumbai [...]. When comparing the numbers given in this article in the right table with those found in Mumbai, Delhi would be the larger metropolis. --Abdull 07:30, 4 May 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Seven major cities have been discovered in Delhi

I read this in the book by khushwant singh ,that delhi was destroyed 7 times and was rebuilt 7 times.202.89.69.130 05:31, 31 July 2007 (UTC)Yourdeadin


[edit] Raja Dhillu?

The article states Raja Dhillu (King Dhillu) founded ancient Delhi in 800 BC. I know of no inscription or text mentioning Raja Dhillu before 1882AD. There were many chronologies of Delhi compiled before 1882AD, none of them mention Raja Dhillu.

--ISKapoor 22:44, 13 September 2007 (UTC)

Hmmm. Also, the source mentioned of that bit of statement is incomplete, it does not have page number. It is a bad source. So, what do you suggest, should we remove that statement? I think so.--Dwaipayan (talk) 01:35, 14 September 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Sports

"The coming years will see the city host the 2010 Commonwealth Games, projected to be the largest multi-sport event ever held in the 'city'...". I thought the 2010 Commonwealth Games would be the biggest multi-sporting event in the country. Have not heard of any other multi-sporting event that was bigger. What say? Syiem (talk) 08:21, 21 November 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Must Check : Infobox

I was just comparing infoboxes of Delhi and Mumbai and found strange disparities. Even though infoboxes show population of -

  • Delhi as 13,782,976 (13 million 782 thousand and 976) or 13.8 million approx. as of 2001, and that of
  • Mumbai as 13.3 million as of 2006,

how come Delhi is 2nd largest metropolitan city in the country?

Even on comparing by area Delhi is far more larger than Mumbai -

  • Delhi - 1,483 sq km
  • Mumbai - 603.45 sq km

Don't know why nobody else found it. Please review the data and discuss the situation so as to reach a consensus. It would be better if official data from Indian government is used for the purpose.

- Manik (talk) 22:48, 24 December 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Why not use more graphics???

I guess it would be just to use more graphic representations, like infoboxes, templates and images to show data as it would be more presentable, shorten the length of pages, and provide more information also. We can cut short text data also.

I would also propose sub-categorisation of sections like transport, media, sports, education etc. - Manik (talk) 19:15, 25 December 2007 (UTC)

Please look at other featured Indian city articles. None have subsections. Itgoes against the format of the Featured Article tohave subsections. There are guidelines that we follow here. The WP:India guidelines statethat no section should have more than 2 images unless it is really long where 3 can be used. Please have a look at other featured Indian city articles before reverting edits. Nikkul (talk) 15:55, 26 December 2007 (UTC)

Guidelines are fine to work with but they should be modified to include more info, better representation of info. I would suggest that we should also learn from other very well crafted articles like London, real good representation. As of sub-categorization, if a person wishes to learn about bus system only why bother reading out whole section? For example have a look at National Capital Region (India), sub-categories are used in a good way there. - Manik (talk) 19:35, 26 December 2007 (UTC)
NOOO! We are supposed to follow Featured Articles. Featured Articles represent the BEST of Wiki articles. If you would like to change the Featured Article format, please discuss it at WP:FA. Until then, you can not add subsections and random graphics on this page since it is a featured article. Please also see Wikipedia:Summary style. Thanks Nikkul (talk) 01:31, 27 December 2007 (UTC)

OK, then you may like to check NYC, it is a featured article as well as semi-protected from editing too. And it makes use of sub-sections as well as large amount of graphical data too. I am just saying that even a featured article can be improved also and graphics are a good way to do it. - Manik (talk) 11:24, 27 December 2007 (UTC)

Nikkul has a point. We need to follow Wikipedia:WikiProject Indian cities guidelines. Also, we have an article on Transport in Delhi. The main Delhi article just provides a brief summary of each topic. --Mellisa Anthony Jones (talk) 07:35, 6 January 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Images

Why does the article have 2 images on Connaught Place? --Mellisa Anthony Jones (talk) 07:28, 6 January 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Check external links!

Friends, I think we should check external links used in references, further reading and external links section as a few of them are not working. It would be necessary to provide immediate replacement for such references. One such link is reference to 0.2 degree minimum temperature in Delhi. Even the fact is not proved as Delhi has seen lower temps in past. - ℳanikhere since June' 2007 ( talk • contributions ) 00:04, 11 January 2008 (UTC)

The specific example you cited (the lowest temperature reference) is not anymore available online in its location. However, it is archived in Internet Archive. That's the reason the retrieval date is given along with the reference. However, that this is available in the internet archive should be mentioned. And better is, replacing with a readily available source.--Dwaipayan (talk) 00:40, 11 January 2008 (UTC)
Now provided the archive URL and date. Thanks for pointing this out. Yes, more dead links, if there are any, should be checked and taken action against.--Dwaipayan (talk) 00:53, 11 January 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Sister cities

Could somebody add fast the sister cities of Delhi to the article? It would be important for me to create an FA article in the Hungarian Wikipedia. Than you. --Ksanyi (talk) 21:16, 27 January 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Language Terminology

In the demographics section I noticed that the terms "associate offical language" and "second official languages" were used. I would suggest that either the terms be linked, if there is an explanation of what those terms mean elsewhere in Wikipedia, or that each term be followed by a brief explanation in brackets. I would defer to people more knowledgeable than I to do the latter, although, as an unknowledgeable person about the subject, I found the following website page to be helpful: http://www.gloriousindia.org/languages.php

Regards Tschurin (talk) 22:49, 1 February 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Edited version on Hemu Vikramaditya in the year 1556 on DELHI. Citation Needed.

Please note there dozens of books which support what I had added to Delhi website of wikipedia.

Imperial Gazetteer of India while describing 2nd Battle of Panipat writes about Hemu "A man of genius a great warrior & a great administrator,the victor of 22 pitched battles etc."

A British writer, Vincent A. Smith in his book, AKBAR: The Great Mugal pp36-37 (Oxford, 1926) "With the concurrence of his Generals he entered Delhi,raised the canopy over his head & exercised the most cherished privilede of sovereignty by striking coin in his own name. He assumed the style of 'Raja Vikramaditya' which had beed borne by several of the most renowned Hindu Monarchs in ancient times and so entered the field as a competitor for the thorne of Hindustan against both Akbar and Sikandar Sur."

Prof. R.C.Mazumdar in his book "The Mugal empire" Appendix (By the Editor) - Himu- A forgotten Hindu Hero, p100, Published by Bhartiya Vidya Bhawan writes:Whatever had been the desire or the motive of Himu,decided the direction of his future and did preparations accordingly. He won over the hearts of Afghans who helped him in the wars. He distributed wealth librally among the Generals. With their concurrence and support he captured Delhi. After 'Coronation' and completing all the formalities he declared himself as 'Raja Vikramaditya' or Samrat Hem Chander Vikramaditya.He introduced Coins also in his name.

"Akbarnama" a book by Sheikh Abul Fazal, translated by Dr. Mathura Lal Sharma, on page 155-156 state Hemu and Ibrahim had fought many battles. Ibrahim wanted to become a Sultan, but Hemu always defeated him. In Bengal, Sultan Mohammed did become the ruler but he lost. Hemu had fought 22 battles against Adil Shah's enemies and had won all of them. This encouraged him to capture Delhi and establish Hindu Rule in Hindustan. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 117.198.128.89 (talk) 17:18, 13 February 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Edited version on Hemu Vikramaditya in the year 1556 on DELHI. Citation Needed.

Please note that there dozens of books which support what I had added to Delhi website of wikipedia.

Imperial Gazetteer of India while describing 2nd Battle of Panipat writes about Hemu "A man of genius a great warrior & a great administrator,the victor of 22 pitched battles etc."

A British writer, Vincent A. Smith in his book, AKBAR: The Great Mugal pp36-37 (Oxford, 1926) "With the concurrence of his Generals he entered Delhi,raised the canopy over his head & exercised the most cherished privilede of sovereignty by striking coin in his own name. He assumed the style of 'Raja Vikramaditya' which had beed borne by several of the most renowned Hindu Monarchs in ancient times and so entered the field as a competitor for the thorne of Hindustan against both Akbar and Sikandar Sur."

Prof. R.C.Mazumdar in his book "The Mugal empire" Appendix (By the Editor) - Himu- A forgotten Hindu Hero, p100, Published by Bhartiya Vidya Bhawan writes:Whatever had been the desire or the motive of Himu,decided the direction of his future and did preparations accordingly. He won over the hearts of Afghans who helped him in the wars. He distributed wealth librally among the Generals. With their concurrence and support he captured Delhi. After 'Coronation' and completing all the formalities he declared himself as 'Raja Vikramaditya' or Samrat Hem Chander Vikramaditya.He introduced Coins also in his name.

"Akbarnama" a book by Sheikh Abul Fazal, translated by Dr. Mathura Lal Sharma, on page 155-156 state Hemu and Ibrahim had fought many battles. Ibrahim wanted to become a Sultan, but Hemu always defeated him. In Bengal, Sultan Mohammed did become the ruler but he lost. Hemu had fought 22 battles against Adil Shah's enemies and had won all of them. This encouraged him to capture Delhi and establish Hindu Rule in Hindustan.

One can refer following books on Hemu:

"HEMU - Nepoleon of Medieval india" by K.K.Bhardwaj, Delhi "ANOKHA AAROHI" by Kranti Trivedi, Lucknow "MUGHAL EMPIRE" by Ishwari Prashad "HEMU AND HIS TIMES" by M.L.Bhargava "HEMU" By R.K.Bhardwaj "A History of India" by Romila Thapar Vol. 1, Penguin "The Akbar Nama" By Abul Fazal Vol.1 & 2 (Tras. by H.Beverage)Delhi "Akbar the great Mughal" by A. Vincent smith "The Mughal Empire" by A.L.Srivastva

I, Sudhirkbhargava, would like two sentences, which have been removed in last editing, to be re-added to the Delhi website.

—Preceding unsigned comment added by 117.198.128.89 (talk) 17:21, 13 February 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Managing supporting articles.

Since the Delhi article is now "FA class". I guess we should devote time in upgrading secondary supporting articles like Transport in Delhi. It would be good if we can provide extensive informations in those articles and manage them to get atleast an "A class" rating. - ℳanikhere since June' 2007 ( talk • contributions ) 09:31, 16 February 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Delhi Population Table

User:Gppande has added this table. I don't think it's suited for the Delhi page because:

  • ALL Featured Indian city articles do not have this table and have not had this table when they became featured
  • This table would work better on the Mumbai statistics page
  • The average reader doesnt really care about how many people lived in the city 20 years ago and 30 years ago
  • The demographics section is supposed to reflect the current demographics including religion, ethnicity, etc.
  • This table contains very auxiliary information. It not important
  • It's very big and bulky and is really not that informative

Nikkul (talk) 04:54, 30 May 2008 (UTC)

I have moved the discussion to here as this involves discussion on 2 pages. Better to have centralized discussion. --gppande «talk» 09:47, 30 May 2008 (UTC)