Talk:Decepticon

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This article is part of WikiProject Transformers, an attempt to promote better coordination, content distribution, and cross-referencing between pages dealing with Transformers. Please participate by editing the article Decepticon, or visit the project page for more details on the projects.

this should be deleted.

Decepticon is covered better in the parent article

I disagree. Information is better covered in the parent article, but that can be easily remedied. This article is the logical place that a researcher will look if he needs to develop informational source on Decepticon forces, who clearly represent a threat to Autobots, Autobot-sympathists and neutrally aligned forces. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 208.250.65.158 (talk) 19:16, 30 October 2007 (UTC)


Contents

[edit] Speedy Delete?

Where'd the speedy delete come from? It's not listed in article or image history. - MSTCrow 02:07, 21 July 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Vehicle Mode Questions

  • Which Decepticon turns into a C-130 Hercules?
  • Which Decepticon turns into a M2 Bradley?
  • Which Decepticon turns into a C-17 Globemaster III?
  • Which Decepticon turns into a Tu-160 Blackjack?
  • Which Decepticon turns into a RAH-66 Comanche?

(TougHHead 08:13, 29 September 2007 (UTC))

[edit] Popularity?

Let me guess. They are popular due to they turn into military vehicles and have high rating for no reason.(TougHHead 06:33, 4 November 2007 (UTC))

[edit] List of G1

I know that there is already a list of Autobots and list of Decepticons pages, however I would like to know if anyone would be opposed to a Generation 1 list for this page which has both Autobots and Decepticons. It is a bit more compact and you can view it here Libro0 00:42, 3 December 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Decepticon Logo

Since the logo was changed by an anonymous user without discussion I am going to replace the other image. I will only do this once since to me it really doesn't matter one way or another. So if someone wants the new one go ahead and change it back. It does not affect the article content. Libro0 (talk) 18:41, 2 June 2008 (UTC)