Talk:De Havilland Firestreak

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

MILHIST This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see lists of open tasks and regional and topical task forces. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.
Start This article has been rated as Start-Class on the quality scale.

[edit] Effective?

I thought it was pretty ineffective. I'd like to see some sourcing about its effectiveness. I feel sure it was never used in combat and its replacement would seem to argue it was not seen as being totally effective. --John (talk) 03:21, 10 April 2008 (UTC)

I think it's all in the wording. Firestreak was "effective" when it is taken in the correct contexts; comparing it to the Fairey Fireflash and its contemporaries. With the benefit of hindsight, it doesn't look like a marvellous weapon, but it did what it was meant to do, it saw frontline service (if not combat) and ultimately was developed into the far superior Red Top. So a better choice of words and a reference should sort it out. Emoscopes Talk 19:57, 10 April 2008 (UTC)