Talk:De Havilland DH 108

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

	This article is within the scope of the Aviation WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see lists of open tasks and task forces. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.	Aviation Portal
Start	This article has been rated as Start-Class on the quality scale.
Additional information and associated projects or task forces: This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-Class status: Referencing and citation: not checked Coverage and accuracy: not checked Structure: not checked Grammar: not checked Supporting materials: not checked To fill out this checklist, please add the following to the template call: <!-- B-Class-1. It is suitably referenced, and all major points have appropriate inline citations. --> |B-Class-1=yes/no <!-- B-Class-2. It reasonably covers the topic, and does not contain obvious omissions or inaccuracies. --> |B-Class-2=yes/no <!-- B-Class-3. It has a defined structure, including a lead section and one or more sections of content. --> |B-Class-3=yes/no <!-- B-Class-4. It is free from major grammatical errors. --> |B-Class-4=yes/no <!-- B-Class-5. It contains appropriate supporting materials, such as an infobox, images, or diagrams. --> |B-Class-5=yes/no Aircraft WikiProject

[edit] Sound Barrier Dispute

There seems to be a dispute about the F86 beating the DH108 through the sound barrier. I am well aware of the disputed status of the 1947 "sound barrier" flights, and this is unlikely to be resolved at any point, however there was an official flight through the sound barrier on April 26th 1948. This clearly beats the first recorded flight through the sound barrier of the DH108 on 9th September 1948 by over 4 months.EddieWalters 23:04, 18 August 2007 (UTC)

Not only was there no official record which has to be verified by independent witnesses and instrumented data, but there is a wealth of evidence that North American test pilot George Welch did not break the record at all. In the spring of 1944, Welch joined North American Aviation as a test pilot for the P-51 Mustang and later, the FJ Fury and F-86 Sabre. As the chief test pilot, he carried out test flights from September, 1947 at the Muroc test facility (now Edwards AFB, California), the same base at which the Bell X-1 was being developed. North American was instructed by Secretary of the Air Force Stuart Symington that they were not, under any circumstances, to break the sound barrier before the X-1 achieved this milestone. However, Welch disregarded this order, and during a test flight on October 1, 1947 he entered a steep dive from 35,000 ft. During the dive, Welch observed symptoms compatible with Mach jump, and according to some, a sonic boom was heard at the base. However, due to problems with the landing gear, further full-speed flights were delayed. On October 14, the same day that Yeager was to attempt supersonic flight, Welch reputedly performed a second supersonic dive. This time he started from 37,000 ft, and executed a full-power 4g pullout, greatly increasing the power of his apparent sonic boom. Yeager broke the sound barrier approximately 30 minutes later. Welch had no verification, no instrumentation, no record. FWIW Bzuk 04:23, 19 August 2007 (UTC).

BTW, dives are not considered for speed records, only straight-line, level speeds. FWIW Bzuk 06:38, 19 August 2007 (UTC).

Bzuk - don't accuse me of rewriting history without reading the sources I provided. I never claimed that Welch's reported flights before Yeager were the flights that . However, it is officially recorded and acknowledged by the USAF that in April 1948, Welch passed through the sound barrier on an officially verified flight. This version of events is referred to on the F86 Sabre page on Wikipedia, on the link I posted as a reference - http://www.aerospaceweb.org/question/history/q0113.shtml - and numerous other websites (including the National Air and Space Museum http://www.nasm.si.edu/research/aero/aircraft/NAF-86.htm). I believe these are credible sources. I am by no means trying to take anything away from what de Havilland achieved, but I am not comfortable with the page in its current state. You claim that "dives are not considered for speed records". I quote the exact wording of the DH108 article "Then, on 9 September 1948, it exceeded the speed of sound in a shallow dive from 12,195 m (40,000) ft to 9,145 m (30,000) ft.". In reference to the XP86 record (as it was still referred to as the XP86 in April 1948) the National Air and Space Museum website states "In April 1948, the XP-86 exceeded Mach 1 (the speed of sound) in a shallow dive."

I don't know what kind of source you need to see to convince you, but there are MANY pages available at: http://www.google.com/search?q=XP-86+Sound+Barrier+April+1948. I cannot find any credible websites that claim that the DH108 was the first jet aircraft to break the sound barrier.

Clearly looking at the history of this page, this issue has been raised before. We need to come to a consensus answer and resolve the issue.EddieWalters 14:30, 19 August 2007 (UTC)

Eddie, you are right, I jumped to conclusions that you were claiming the earlier unverified flights were being recognized. It was a verified flight that took place although not an official record. My apologies. I have corrected the note in the article with a reference source cited. Too many late nights on the computer, too many fights with vandals, coming across someone I had never seen editing before, all these are feeble excuses. You did a sterling job in explaining the issue and I commend you. FWIW Bzuk 14:49, 19 August 2007 (UTC).

[edit] Wing made of Wood??

In carrying out research on the aircraft, I have been supplied some pictures of the wing in assembly jigs. They are made of metal, using a mixture of modified Vampire parts, and bespoke parts. However, I dont have any verifiable references that will confirm this. I have changed the wording in the main article accordingly, and am open to suggestions on how we might reference this? Brucewgordon (talk) 13:52, 6 December 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Fair use rationale for Image:DH 108 Swallow TG283.jpg

Image:DH 108 Swallow TG283.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot (talk) 05:26, 2 January 2008 (UTC)