User talk:David Little
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
[edit] Welcome to Wikipedia!!!
|
The {{helpme}} template belongs on your talkpage if you need help, you don't need to put it on someone else's page. :) ~Kylu (u|t) 01:35, 1 July 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Helpme listed on your talk page
What kind of help are you looking for? Please let me know so I can assist you. --No1lakersfan 02:00, 1 July 2006 (UTC)
Please use the {{helpme}} only on your talk page. --No1lakersfan 02:13, 1 July 2006 (UTC)
- About the whole Somathencialence thing. Wikipedia is an encyclopedia, so we can't accept things that you have made up. I'll give you a couple of minutes to make a copy of your Somathencialence article, then I will delete it. Please read Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not.--Commander Keane 02:14, 1 July 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Speedy deletion of Great-great-grandparent
A tag has been placed on Great-great-grandparent, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to have no meaningful content or history, and the text is unsalvageably incoherent. If the page you created was a test, please use the sandbox for any other experiments you would like to do. Feel free to leave a message on my talk page if you have any questions about this.
If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the article (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the article's talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. ARendedWinter 21:41, 16 November 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Speedy deletion of Great-great-grandparent
A tag has been placed on Great-great-grandparent, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to have no meaningful content or history, and the text is unsalvageably incoherent. If the page you created was a test, please use the sandbox for any other experiments you would like to do. Feel free to leave a message on my talk page if you have any questions about this.
If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the article (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the article's talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. ARendedWinter 21:48, 16 November 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Speedy deletion of Exchangement
A tag has been placed on Exchangement requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a very short article providing little or no context to the reader. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.
If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the article (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the article's talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Kim Dent-Brown (Talk to me) 23:51, 1 December 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Melor (injury)
A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Melor (injury), suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page. Also, please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. If you agree with the deletion of the article, and you are the only person who has made substantial edits to the page, please add {{db-author}} to the top of Melor (injury). Kim Dent-Brown (Talk to me) 23:53, 1 December 2007 (UTC)
You have recently recreated or reposted material at Somathencialence which previously was deleted in accordance with Wikipedia's deletion policies. Please do not recreate this page without prior approval from an administrator or you may be blocked from editing. We ask that you respect what Wikipedia is not. If you disagree with the page's deletion, you may seek an independent deletion review. -Carados (talk) 22:38, 9 December 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Signing posts
-
Hello. In case you didn't know, when you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you should sign your posts by typing four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment. You may also click on the signature button 
located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when. Thank you. -Carados (talk) 22:43, 9 December 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Hello
Hello, fellow Wikipedian, I am writing this to tell you that you seem to be recreating a page, if you think that this page should be created please send it to a Deletion review where they will review the merits of the article. Thank you. VivioFateFan (Talk, Sandbox) 23:37, 9 December 2007 (UTC)
[edit] January 2008
Hi, the recent edit you made to Chemistry has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thanks. Sam Korn (smoddy) 19:56, 30 January 2008 (UTC)
[edit] Toad (color)
A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Toad (color), suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page. Also, please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. If you agree with the deletion of the article, and you are the only person who has made substantial edits to the page, please add {{db-author}} to the top of Toad (color). Jeepday (talk) 17:18, 2 February 2008 (UTC)
- David I will be submitting Toad (color) for WP:AFD, I will give you a link to the debate when I have posted it completely. Please be aware that the reference you are trying to provide www.davidlittle5.tripod.com/frogstoads has an obvious similarity to your Wikipedia log on of User:David Little. This would not meet the requirements of WP:RS and would seem to support that the article Toad (color) is Original research. If you have any questions please ask at my talk page. Jeepday (talk) 17:45, 2 February 2008 (UTC)
[edit] AfD nomination of Toad (color)
An article that you have been involved in editing, Toad (color), has been listed for deletion. If you are interested in the deletion discussion, please participate by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Toad (color). Thank you. Jeepday (talk) 18:04, 2 February 2008 (UTC)
Please stop. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did to Toad (color), you will be blocked from editing. Jeepday (talk) 18:14, 2 February 2008 (UTC)
This is the last warning you will receive for your disruptive edits.
The next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did to Toad (color), you will be blocked from editing. Jeepday (talk) 18:18, 2 February 2008 (UTC)
[edit] Blocked
I have blocked you for 8 hours for persistent removal of an articles for deletion template after final warning. You are welcome to edit after the block expires. Hut 8.5 18:27, 2 February 2008 (UTC)
