User:David J Wilson/sandbox1
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
[edit] Other formulas involving Euler's function
where m > 1 is a positive integer and ω(m) designates the number of distinct prime factors of m. (This formula counts the number of naturals less than or equal to n and relatively prime to m, additional material is listed among the external links.)
| Proofs of some of these identities can be seen by clicking on "show". |
|---|
|
Click on "hide" (to the far right on the line above) to hide these proofs. [edit] Proofs of totient identities involving the floor functionThe proof of the identity is by mathematical induction on n. The base case is n = 1 and we see that the claim holds: For the induction step we need to prove that The key observation is that so that the sum is Now the fact that is a basic totient identity. To see that it holds, let by definition of μ(k). This concludes the proof.[citation needed] An alternate proof proceeds by substituting Now we ask how often the term as claimed.[citation needed] The trick where zero values of[citation needed] The base case is n = 1 and we have and it holds. The induction step requires us to show that Next observe that[citation needed] This gives the following for the sum Treating the two inner terms separately, we get The first of these two is precisely This result may also be proved by inclusion-exclusion. Rewrite the identity as Now we see that the left side counts the number of lattice points (a, b) in [1,n] × [1,n] where a and b are relatively prime to each other. Using the sets Ap where p is a prime less than or equal to n to denote the set of points where both coordinates are divisible by p we have This formula counts the number of pairs where a and b are not relatively prime to each other. The cardinalities are as follows: and the signs are
but this is precisely |













be the prime factorization of n+1. Then
directly into the left side of the identity, giving 
occurs in the double sum. The answer is that it occurs for every multiple
such multiples, which means that the sum is
are filtered out may also be used to prove the identity





as we saw earlier, and the second is zero, by a basic property of the
.) This concludes the proof.


, hence the number of points with relatively prime coordinates is
and we have the claim.
