Talk:Davis Motomiya
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Contents |
[edit] Picture
We could probably do better with a picture here... —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Rhymeless (talk • contribs).
[edit] When does Davis finds out
When does Davis finds out that Veemon was origonal Ryo's digimon. Strike Chaos 00:41, 29 January 2007 (UTC)
- I don't believe it ever happens in the anime, just in one of the video game plots. May or may not be "canon" depending on one's view. Different people worked on the game than who worked on 02. -- Ned Scott 01:18, 29 January 2007 (UTC)
- video games are generally considered to be from a different alternate universe to the anime, even if they share characters. Kind of like Ryo in the games and Ryo in tamers. --`/aksha 10:07, 29 January 2007 (UTC)
- Although that is the case for the Digimon Adventure and 02 DigiDestined that appeared in Digimon Digital Card Battle, Ryo who appeared in Digimon Adventure: Cathode and Anode Tamer, Digimon Adventure 02: Tag Tamers, Digimon Adventure 02: D1 Tamers and Digimon Tamers: Brave Tamer is canon (but not without a few plotholes), and Digimon Adventure 02: Tag Tamers greatly effected Digimon Adventure 02. Anyway Davis never finds out, nor is Ryo ever mentioned in 02, we only see him in a flashback. Nightmare SE 13:44, 29 January 2007 (UTC)
- I know those games where supposed to be in the same 'cannon' as 02. But the point is really that video games in general (when they're based off existing series) are not considered to be on the same level of 'cannon' as the original series. It's like, they can be official, and officially 'cannon', but still considered an AU because plot elements/characters/and so on get adapted for the purpose of a game. If digimon had different levels of cannon (something like what star wars has), the anime would be the highest level of cannon. Games such as the ones you've listed would be officially 'cannon', but of a lower level. --`/aksha 01:27, 30 January 2007 (UTC)
- Although that is the case for the Digimon Adventure and 02 DigiDestined that appeared in Digimon Digital Card Battle, Ryo who appeared in Digimon Adventure: Cathode and Anode Tamer, Digimon Adventure 02: Tag Tamers, Digimon Adventure 02: D1 Tamers and Digimon Tamers: Brave Tamer is canon (but not without a few plotholes), and Digimon Adventure 02: Tag Tamers greatly effected Digimon Adventure 02. Anyway Davis never finds out, nor is Ryo ever mentioned in 02, we only see him in a flashback. Nightmare SE 13:44, 29 January 2007 (UTC)
- video games are generally considered to be from a different alternate universe to the anime, even if they share characters. Kind of like Ryo in the games and Ryo in tamers. --`/aksha 10:07, 29 January 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Digidestoned team #4
am i the only one counting the team numbers for that universe, davis's son is leader of team #4 not team two as stated. (That was davis's team)HHS.student
- They were not an actual team like the DigiDestined in Digimon Adventure or 02, I removed it. Nightmare SE 00:51, 8 February 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Tamers narraton
Is really Davis the narrator in Digimon Tamers? Tamers is a different continuity, so it's hard to be real. Can someone confirm that?
The voice at the end of each episode that did the "to be continued" thing was his, at least, in the dub it was. Not sure about the original version.24.107.59.242 18:37, 20 May 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Fair use rationale for Image:Char-daisuke.jpg
Image:Char-daisuke.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in Wikipedia articles constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If there is other other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 05:10, 2 June 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Fair use rationale for Image:Davis middle aged man.jpg
Image:Davis middle aged man.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.
BetacommandBot 20:12, 29 October 2007 (UTC)

