Talk:David Toska

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

	Norway Portal This article is part of WikiProject Norway, an attempt to better organize information in articles related to Norway. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the quality scale.

This article must adhere to the policy on biographies of living persons. Controversial material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted or if there are other concerns relative to this policy, report it on the living persons biographies noticeboard.

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography. For more information, visit the project page.	Biography Portal
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's quality scale. [FAQ] Please rate the article and, if you wish, leave comments here regarding your assessment or the strengths and weaknesses of the article.

Can someone explain in the article the connection of Toska to the stolen Munch paintings? I don't get it. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 85.179.6.244 (talk) 04:45, 3 November 2007 (UTC)

You sure Toska grew up in Ullevål? I know for a fact that he went to Bjølsen Skole (skole = school)that is in, yes, Bjølsen. If he lived in Ullevål there would be closer schools to go to.

Not my data. Might better be edited as Oslo, don't you think? By the way, the insert on the Munch robbery or other information is in my opinion not libellous, as he has stood trial and been convicted or acquitted for the crimes mentioned. Reference to his involvement in the role of getting the pictures back does not point to him being involved in that crime, however likely. It can be cited from reliable news sources that there have been conversations between his lawyer and the state attourney Busch on this. More data on the police involvement might be slander. It has however been an exceptional amount of circumstantial and hard evidence cirulated in the media these last years on this issue. It is therefore not an exaggeration or skewing of facts that there have existed various complex networks bordering on scandal. Naming those persons, whether it be fellow unvicted criminals, familiy or those involved as informers, business relationships and police agents would be a sensitive matter.