Talk:David Smith (sculptor)

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

David Smith (sculptor) is part of WikiProject Ohio, which collaborates on Ohio-related subjects on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to current discussions.
Start This article has been rated as Start-class on the quality scale.
??? This article has not yet received a rating on the importance scale.

Please rate this article, and then leave comments here to explain the ratings and/or to identify the strengths and weaknesses of the article.

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography. For more information, visit the project page.
Start This article has been rated as Start-Class on the project's quality scale. [FAQ]
This article is supported by the Arts and Entertainment work group.
This article falls within the scope of WikiProject Visual arts, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to visual arts on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.
??? Class: This article has not been assigned a class according to the assessment scale.
  • Disagree, works of art, especially notable ones such as this, deserve their own page.
    • In that case, should there just be a section on the Cubis series instead of a single work? Although there's a need to expand the David Smith entry to reflect such importance.
    • I could see a page being created to describe the entire series, but I don't think that individual pages created for the more culturally signifigant pieces should be disallowed. So, I respectfully disagree. AriGold 17:03, 20 December 2005 (UTC)
  • Disagree. Properly fleshed-out, this page is going to crowd the limits for how long a page should be. Merging the Cubis series into this article would make it excessively long. ClairSamoht 23:27, 4 April 2006 (UTC)
  • Disagree. Works of art and their respective artists should have separate pages, unless the artist is known solely for that particular creation. Since that is clearly not the case with Smith, the articles should be kept separate. However, I would advocate merging any future detailed information about other Cubis with Cubi XXVIII to create a solitary article about the series (similarly with his other series, if they accumulate enough information). Bastin8 23:48, 11 April 2006 (UTC)