Talk:David Smith (Australian public servant)
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
 |
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography. For more information, visit the project page. | ||
| Stub | This article has been rated as Stub-Class on the project's quality scale. [FAQ] | ||
 |
This article has been automatically assessed as Stub-Class by WikiProject Biography because it uses a stub template.
|
 |
David Smith (Australian public servant) is within the scope of WikiProject Australia, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of Australia and Australia-related topics. If you would like to participate, visit the project page. | ||
| Stub | This article has been rated as Stub-class on the quality scale. | ||
| ??? | This article has not yet received a rating on the importance scale. | ||
|
Assessment comments
|
|||
|
|
This article has been automatically assessed as Stub-Class by WikiProject Australia because it uses a stub template.
|
What exactly he accuse Whitlam of misleading the Australian public about? I saw his ACA interview, and all that came across was that he didn't like Whitlam, and did like Kerr. Ambi 05:55, 9 Nov 2004 (UTC)
An article may be found here. I am rather puzzled at the statement in the article that Whitlam "vehemently rejected" Sir David's claims, as to the best of my knowledge he has not commented.
Smith's knighthood was one awarded by the British Government in recognition of his personal services to the Queen, as he spent a year or so at Buckingham Palace after he retired from his position as Official Secretary to the Governor-General. The Commonwealth government ceased recommending knighthoods when the Order of Australia system was introduced by Whitlam. Presumably the British Government could continue to award knighthoods to other Australians in the same way that knighthoods are occasionally awarded to non-British citizens like Bob Geldof. Skyring 11:11, 3 Jan 2005 (UTC)
It seems to me that David Smith is totally correct in requesting Whitlam to apologise to the Australian people about the incompetence of the Labor Party during his term in office.
Nothing could illustrate this more than the circumstances surrounding the appointment of Albert Field to the Senate in 1975, the event that enabled the opposition to pass resolutions deferring supply.
Premier Bjelke-Petersen had made a conciliatory gesture on the death of senator Bert Millner by agreeing "that it was a genuine death, not a contrived death", and that all he wanted the Labor Party to do was what they had asked the non-labor parties to do when the first casual vacancy occurred, that is, to provide three names of Labor Party members, with Petersen being able to choose from the three. Instead of providing the name they wanted, and two lesbian feminist marxists, so that Petersen had no choice but to turn the handle, they said they would only submit one name, and then Petersen said he would find another Labor man. Of course the biggest laugh in the whole affair was the name of the man for whom the ALP were prepared to risk deferral of supply - Mal Colston! I tell you australian politics is the best free show in town.
Of course the best bit every three years is when all the committed republicans on both sides swear on oath that they will be faithful and bear true allegiance to Her Majesty. plerdsus 15/01/2008 —Preceding unsigned comment added by Plerdsus (talk • contribs) 01:10, 15 January 2008 (UTC)
It's a bit late but what the hell.
- Smith's knighthood was KCVO, the Royal Victorian Order, which is in the personal gift of the sovereign. The British government had nothing to do with it.
- He wasn't the last Australian to be knighted - that was Sir Robert May, who got a Knight Bachelor in 1996.
- The British government cannot award knighthoods or any other imperial awards or honours to Australians without the agreement of the Australian government. But the Australian government's stated policy is that it will not agree to knighthoods.
- I guess theoretically the British government could award an honorary knighthood or other honorary award to an Australian, which would not require the Australian government's approval. But that would be considered very bad form, given the Australian government's clear position on knighthoods. I think it would never happen in practice.
- However that still leaves me wondering how Robert May got a Knight Bachelor in 1996. That could only have been awarded by the British government. I've seen nothing to suggest he has British citizenship, so how come an Australian citizen got a knighthood (and since then, a peerage as well) unless the Australian government waived its normal policy? I've asked some pertinent questions on Robert May's talk page. JackofOz 10:12, 2 February 2006 (UTC)
I would suspect that the policy of not allowing foreign awards and titles to be conferred on Australian's may not be an actual policy of each incumbent government. If memory serves me correctly Gough Whitlam has been conferred a knighthood by the French government at one stage. 150.101.166.218 22:54, 13 February 2006 (UTC)
According to the It's an Honour website any Australian citizen may accept an honour from the Queen or her government, see http://www.itsanhonour.gov.au/honours/our_honours/index.cfm it clearly states on this website that an honour from the Queen herself can be accepted without permission being sort after. However permission does need to be granted by the Governer General for all other foreign awards.
