Talk:David Prager

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography. For more information, visit the project page.	Biography Portal
Stub	This article has been rated as Stub-Class on the project's quality scale. [FAQ]

This article has been automatically assessed as Stub-Class by WikiProject Biography because it uses a stub template. If you agree with the assessment, please remove {{WPBiography}}'s auto=yes parameter from this talk page. If you disagree with the assessment, please change it by editing the class parameter of the {{WPBiography}} template, removing {{WPBiography}}'s auto=yes parameter from this talk page, and removing the stub template from the article.

Someone really needs to find out his birthdate. I've searched and can't find it anywhere.--Underdog 16:44, 25 August 2006 (UTC)

Where did you start looking? Knowing what country he was born in might help. From the name I guess he is from an English speaking nation, one of which may have had recent immigration from continental Europe. From the location of the company I assume he is American, although he could be Canadian (or even Australian) according to my analysis on the basis of his first & surnames. This is why I get pissed at editors who don't include nationality (when known) on subjects, it makes it all the more difficult for subsequent contributors.

Alright, rant over! LessHeard vanU 21:50, 20 January 2007 (UTC)

He is a San Francisco resident, 30 years old @ Jan 2007 according to his phone entry and Myspace accounts. Right, I'm bored with this... Somebody else can update the article. LessHeard vanU 22:05, 20 January 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Deletion

You cannot say that digg.com or Revision3 are not notable. Diggnation I believe has more than 20,000 downloads per episode. Please correct my numbers if I am wrong. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 68.110.186.170 (talk) 00:22, 15 May 2007 (UTC).

i am not saying digg.com or revision3 are not notable. i did not prod them. i prodded david prager. what i am saying is that they are not notable enough to justify multiple ancillary articles on otherwise minor people. Misterdiscreet 04:28, 30 May 2007 (UTC)