User talk:DanielCristofani
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Yes I did see it, thanks. Evercat 11:40, 6 May 2005 (UTC)
2691033 2767233 2786802
Contents |
[edit] Machine code quine
I've added your program to quine. You might want to take a look, and change anything you don't like. Superm401 | Talk 02:38, Jun 17, 2005 (UTC)
[edit] Brainfuck to Turing machines
Hi,
You wrote you hadn't seen transformations from Brainfuck to Turing machines. I've chosen to do it as a student work this year, so I've written a compiler that takes a BF program, and outputs a program for a Turing machine. I've also written an interpreter for this output code. You can find both there : [[1]] It makes no optimisations on the BF code for the moment (it's hard to optimize BF code, except if BF programs have useless instructions, for instance -+,), and the execution is really slooooooow. I have written it in OCaml, though I wanted to do it in BF, but by teachers wouldn't let me do that :-) (They don't like to spend nights on BF programs...)
--King Mike 19:22, 22 November 2005 (UTC)
[edit] Dreams
I was in a supermarket and a blond welldressed thirtyish woman was walking up and down the bread aisle repeatedly with an empty cart. She explained "Oh, no--they pay me to keep the bread fresh by thinking about it."
[edit] Mille Bornes
Hi, I see you edited Mille Bornes. I'd like to ask if you might be able to come up with any images for it. Please check out Talk:Mille Bornes and Talk:Mille Bornes/work. Thank you. John Reid 01:18, 14 April 2006 (UTC)
haha that's so stupid! I'll concede to rigor being an American spelling if and when American becomes a synonym for incorrect. Besides the page it links to spells it as rigour, so if they want to defend their error then they should at least be consistent... which leads me to asking, who are the they that are disallowing the correct spelling of rigour? - fildon
[edit] Caffeine
Well spotted on the caffeine edit. Just thought I'd pop over to thank you. Medos (talk • contribs) 09:56, 9 March 2008 (UTC)
