From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

	Portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Anime and manga, which aims to improve and expand anime and manga related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can edit this article or visit the project page.
B	This article has been rated as B-Class on the assessment scale.

Slow burning edit war: Dante's end I think we should resolve this now about what we should say about what we should say about dante's end. We don't now how she died. But if we check the edit logs you'll see that people have been changing about Dante's death over and over. I think we should have that long explationan about why there is a 100% (its cannon) chance that Dante is dead so people don't think she can come back (MJW)

[edit] 20 Years Ago

Where does it say that Hohenheim left Dante for Trisha? I don't remember anything that indicated that his leaving Dante and finding Trisha occured at the same time. In fact, the destruction of Xerxes may indicate that he had left Dante over 200 years ago as she refers to the incident as if she was not involved.

[edit] Discrepancies Section

I have a few problems with this section. Firstly, Hohenheim mentioned to Dante in Episode 44 that she must have "used up the last fragment [he] had left her", thereby negating the entire "plot hole" concerning the Dante's Philosophers Stone and the time when it was created. And as for the case of Dante's transferral being unnecessary, Hohenheim's words at the end of the same episode seem to explain this, "...In exchange for that promise, [Hohenheim] will tell [Dante] the reason why [her] new body is rotting, too", implying that her previous vessel was also rotting. Also note the scene in Episode 45 where Hohenheim's rot is shown. Wouldn't it make sense that Dante's first-shown vessel accumulated more rot than his over time, seeing as it is far older than Hohenheim's? Surely that would justify the transfer, and it is supported by evidence shown in the anime.

No longer seeing a point to this speculative section, I removed it entirely. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 76.117.168.8 (talk) 21:18, 2 October 2007 (UTC)