Talk:Danny Casolaro
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
 |
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography. For more information, visit the project page. | ||
| Start | This article has been rated as start-Class on the project's quality scale. [FAQ] | ||
 |
It is requested that a picture or pictures of this person be included in this article to improve its quality. |
 |
An appropriate infobox may need to be added to this article, or the current infobox may need to be updated. Please refer to the list of biography infoboxes for further information. |
Article claims Casalaro committed suicide! This is lies, he was murdered! Conwiki 03:06, 20 May 2005 (UTC)
- This is an encyclopedia. If you have good, sourced evidence for his murder, then review the NPOV policy and add it according to the guidelines. --Viriditas | Talk 06:24, 20 May 2005 (UTC)
Is not it possible to formulate in a way that does not rule out violent death? I don't want to make every point, but that the balming was incorrect is a very clear observation. When specialists start implying that (the towels affair) the police makes the case, when non religious people mention god in suicide notes, its all very classical. And after all even some cia agents don't want to lie over his death. As far as him being depressed on that eveing goes ,(it seems so heavily weighted in the article) barman are not always the better witness; since he was manipulated by phone , he may have had disturbing phonecalls or a dip in the research(that was actually the case), he may have received new threats, or even have suspected he was in problems over his head. All decent reasons to seem somewhat depressed. So especially since his close friends had been informed not to take everything for granted and even informed them of not having suicidal intends,the lousy investigation, the mingling with proof, professional disappearance of his papers, and the deep slashes, i think he was killed professionally, and for sad reasons since much what he was finding has been uncovered after. The exact circle of killers may be deduced by comparative analyses of murders and suspect suicides in the years it happened. For me the article indeed is strongly in denial.77.248.56.242
[edit] Recent additions
Hi 205.118.16.153, thanks for adding all that material. I'm sorry if my edit summaries sounded harsh; I didn't mean them to. My concern is only that everything should be sourced, especially with a topic like this where there are so many rumors, and that we should be careful not to add our own opinion e.g. "Some of Riconoscuito's claims seemed accurate." Also, please try to explain who all the players are, because it gets very confusing.
I added of the two writers who quote the waitress that they were "conspiracy-theory writers." You may feel that's too POV, so by all means find another expression. I used that one because one of them actually published (and may still do) a magazine or website devoted to conspiracy theories, so it seemed apt to call him that. Cheers, SlimVirgin (talk) 19:46, 14 February 2006 (UTC)
