Talk:Danish parliamentary election, 2007
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
 |
Danish parliamentary election, 2007 falls within the scope of WikiProject Denmark, a project to create and improve Denmark-related Wikipedia articles. If you would like to participate, you can visit the project page, all interested editors are welcome! |
|
| B | This article has been rated as B-Class on the quality scale. (FAQ). (If you rated the article please give a short summary at comments to explain the ratings and/or to identify the strengths and weaknesses.) |
|
| High | This article has been rated as High-importance on the importance scale. | |
[edit] Sorting
Maybe the party names in the opinion polls should be sorted in a more neutral way. I sorted them like this in order to give people who are not familiar with Danish politics an idea of their percieved allegiance. However the list of coalitions might have made it redundant. --Bagande 09:19, 11 May 2007 (UTC)
- I think the list of coalitions already convey that information. Should it be added somewhere that only a number of the parties have the 20,000 signatures in order? Liberalisterne haven't got them by a longshot, CD is close, but not there yet, New Alliance will no doubt get them in a month or so. I don't know what the status is for the Minority Party and the Progress Party since both of these are must be almost defunct. Valentinian T / C 21:07, 13 May 2007 (UTC)
-
- So you agree that the list of coalitions have made it unnecessary? I think that I'll change it but I can't bother doing it twice in case NA doesn't choose N. So it has got to wait a bit. The fact that only some of the parties are as of yet eligible to run is reflected in the way the way they are sectioned. However it might be nice to add a small explanations of what it takes to be allowed to run if you are not already represented.
-
- As for MP and PP, I would like to keep them until they declare that they will not attempt to run. Such a thing might already have been declared but I have not been able to track it down.--Bagande 13:34, 29 May 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Greenlandic and Faroese parties
I have not been able to find a list similar to the Danish Parties eligible to run for neither Greenland nor the Faroe Islands. Nor have I been able to find any rules stating the requirements that have to be met in order to run in the Faroes and Greenland. It would be nice if somebody could clarify who is eligible to run in GL and FO, who has declared intentions but are as of now not eligible etc.--Bagande 13:42, 29 May 2007 (UTC)
- I left a notice on the two related wikiprojects recently, but noone has commented so far. A few parties have, however, been moved around in the Greenland area. Lilac Soul (talk • contribs • count) 15:56, 30 October 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Fair use rationale for Image:Dk-KF-logo nyt.png
Image:Dk-KF-logo nyt.png is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in Wikipedia articles constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If there is other other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 01:46, 3 June 2007 (UTC)
[edit] New Alliance
With the 20,000 signatures obtained by New Alliance, shouldn't they be moved up to Parties running? Lilac Soul 20:37, 6 July 2007 (UTC)
- No answer, it seems. I'll do it, then, and if anybody disagrees, they can move it back and state their reasons here. Lilac Soul 11:36, 8 July 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Wikinews interviews
If anyone is interested in their being original interviews of Danish parliamentary candidates on Wikinews, submit questions to my talk page on the English Wikinews. Thanks! -- Zanimum 18:56, 24 October 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Fair use rationale for Image:RadikaleVenstreElectionLogo.gif
Image:RadikaleVenstreElectionLogo.gif is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.
BetacommandBot 22:21, 25 October 2007 (UTC)
- It seems somebody has handled this already, so no need for anybody else to go there. I think. Lilac Soul (talk • contribs • count) 07:39, 26 October 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Fair use rationale for Image:DanishSocialDemocratsElectionLogo.gif
Image:DanishSocialDemocratsElectionLogo.gif is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.
BetacommandBot 07:27, 27 October 2007 (UTC)
[edit] By party
The name "Centrist parties" are POV and are not used in Denmark in any media I know of. See also [1]. The section "By potential coalition" is speculaton about which parties could end up formining goverment and I dont think speculations should be part of a wikipedia article. Only facts in an wikipedia article. Lennart.larsen 12:28, 16 November 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Fair use rationale for Image:Nyalliance.jpg
Image:Nyalliance.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.
BetacommandBot (talk) 17:27, 5 December 2007 (UTC)
