Talk:Dan Carlin
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
[edit] What needs references?
Perhaps Scientizzle can tell us exactly what portions of the article are so controversial that they need references. IMO, the Common Sense show itself is your reference. I've listened to every show, and I think the author of this article pretty much nailed it. 206.124.6.154 01:16, 13 September 2007 (UTC)
- That may be true, but notability isn't really asserted well and there's a lot of claims that should be referenced specifically with independent reliable sources. This will help the article meet Wikipedia's policies of verifiability, no original research, and neutral point-of-view. The current article is kind of fawning and there is no link to any external coverage of Carlin nor his shows. — Scientizzle 03:12, 13 September 2007 (UTC)
- Dude. It's a PODCAST. "External coverage?" LOL. 206.124.6.154 (talk) 20:10, 12 December 2007 (UTC)
What's that old saying...if you want it done right?

