User talk:Damiens.rf/Archive 35

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Archive This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page.

Contents

Tribal Leadership

I found some book reviews in U.S. newspapers for Tribal Leadership and added them to the article, so I think notability is now indicated. --Eastmain (talk) 00:34, 11 April 2008 (UTC)

Re: Please check...

Although the image here is larger and has a 4:3 instead of 3:4 orientation, it is essentially the same image and the website states the same author, so it's fine. Thanks for fixing the problem. MECUtalk 17:32, 15 April 2008 (UTC)

Ten Pound Sound

Wow, I nominated this for deletion at exactly the same moment that you did. What are the odds? Ten Pound Hammer and his otters(Broken clamshellsOtter chirps) 13:20, 18 April 2008 (UTC)

Suzanne and Jim

I do not know of any sources, in fact I tagged it. I do not truly know if Suzanne and Jim are notable per Wiki:musician guidelines; it was nominated to be speedy deleted, but speedy was rejected due to the "assertion of notability"... I'm searching for sources now. The articles' creator hasn't responded... not a good sign usiually. Frog47 (talk) 13:54, 25 April 2008 (UTC)

David Sustak

Your nomination for deletion is showing up as a red link on the David Sustak page. Corvus cornixtalk 23:05, 25 April 2008 (UTC)

Anyway

Anyway, Thanks & Regards. --Bhadani (talk) 01:34, 29 April 2008 (UTC)

Fine. And, in the morning (Indian Standard Time), I was in a crazy mood, and feel sorry if I hurt your feelings in anyway. Regards. --Bhadani (talk) 17:34, 29 April 2008 (UTC)

Rock and Ice climbing club at AfD

I have added some references, both print and online, to the AfD for the Rock and Ice climbing club in an attempt to demonstrate its notability -- see Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Rock and Ice climbing club. Regards, Espresso Addict (talk) 06:11, 30 April 2008 (UTC)

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Crutchfield

No harm no foul, okay? Innocent mistake, and I've toned down the harsh language in the AFD discussion page from an administrative standpoint, as it is divisive and unproductive. I like to emphasize content, not contributor. (In other words, you're forgiven. ;-) ) Cheers and happy editing! - CobaltBlueTony™ talk 01:04, 4 May 2008 (UTC)

"first vendor-authorized audio/video retailer on the Internet"

As the internet was beginning its real growth as a commercial application, many sites opened up to sell stuff. Crutchfield was the first company to start up its own site, as opposed to hiring a firm to do it for them, or just offering its line to another vendor to sell. Kind of like the difference between buying Taco Bell products in a grocery store and going to one of their restaurants. - CobaltBlueTony™ talk 16:00, 5 May 2008 (UTC)

List of climbers

If you are interested in any information related to high asia mountaineering, just ask Eberhard Jurgalski the leading chronicler and statistician of world mountaineering. There is no need to correct his data. Pepto65 (talk) 21:35, 20 May 2008 (UTC) Perhaps you find it helpful to ask Viewfinder to get a sense, which kind of source Jurgalski is. Pepto65 (talk) 11:12, 21 May 2008 (UTC)

Red Roof Inn

Anon editors are not de facto vandals. Also, there was tons of legitimate content lost; next time try reverting to a a better version. It doesn't need to be perfect; don't lose all that useful and referenced content because it may have issues. I've restored a good version and tagged it for the issues I saw. Cheers! - CobaltBlueTony™ talk 16:21, 5 May 2008 (UTC)

Weasel words: :Weasel words are small phrases attached to the beginning of a statement, such as "some argue that..." or "critics say...", etc.. A serious problem with weasel-worded statements, aside from their veracity, is that their implication is misleading or too vague to substantiate."
The statement you removed should, at most, be tagged for fact-checking via {{fact}}. It's kind of like "the sky is blue." Everyone knows it, but someone might require sources to verify it. - CobaltBlueTony™ talk 16:31, 5 May 2008 (UTC)
The word "distinguished" doesn't even appear on the page. Can you clarify, please? Thanks. - CobaltBlueTony™ talk 16:33, 5 May 2008 (UTC)
Unless its original research, it must have come from somewhere. The info doesn't seem harmful, so it's better to search, or ask the creator/editor of the info, instead of just deleting it. If we can't source it or find similar sources saying a similar thing, we should then delete it. But that sort of info is valuable and something like it should be in the article. - CobaltBlueTony™ talk 16:41, 5 May 2008 (UTC)
"Truth" and "verifiability" are two distinct concepts here. We search for verifiability, and it is on that alone that the section should be tagged. If someone published it, and they are a reliable source, we should keep it. IF it's anecdotal original research, or contradicted by other reliable sources, then we need to document ALL of that. - CobaltBlueTony™ talk 16:49, 5 May 2008 (UTC)

Found this. - CobaltBlueTony™ talk 16:57, 5 May 2008 (UTC)

Primary sources are valid if notable and verifiable. We cite music artists' sites when the announce the release of an album or song (otherwise we usually tag as a violation of WP:CRYSTAL). We don't take their peacock terms, but facts are acceptable. - CobaltBlueTony™ talk 17:02, 5 May 2008 (UTC)

Trip hop

The trip hop page needs external links. Those websites are needed. What the hell is wrong with you? Fclass (talk) 19:50, 12 May 2008 (UTC)

Foolish (Shawty Lo song)

Why did you take this to AfD if you think it should be merged? AfD is for deletion only, not for merging. Ten Pound Hammer and his otters(Broken clamshellsOtter chirps) 23:53, 17 May 2008 (UTC)