User talk:Dalej78

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

[edit] Global warming edit, WP:3RR

Hi Dalej. You keep inserting "alleged" into the introduction of global warming, originally pointing to this article for justification. That article is a press release, not a reviewed scientific paper. But what is more, it does not deny warming but in contrast explicitly acknowledges it a number of times. Please stop this disruptive pattern. Please also be aware of WP:3RR, the Wikipedia policy restricting editors to at most 3 reverts per article per 24h period. For this policy, the definition of "revert" is fairly broad. If you ignore WP:3RR, you may be temporarily blocked. If an edit meets stiff opposition, it is normally more productive to discuss it on the articles talk page. --Stephan Schulz (talk) 14:41, 10 December 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Global warming

You may think that global warming is not happening. However, the thing you apparently think is not happening is the measured recent increase in temperature and continued warming in the future. The best way to argue against something is to define it, and then to argue against it, not to re-define it. Global warming should first be defined, and then, in the appropriate articles with the appropriate weight given to different evidence and viewpoints, the arguments against it can be given. It does not strengthen your argument to have a weaker proposition to argue against. Please be cooperative on this encyclopedia and work towards consensus in articles. - Enuja (talk) 20:04, 15 December 2007 (UTC)